Folks, what follows is a list. A list of people who dared criticize the gay "rights" process. They paid a heavy toll. Read on.
Alberta, Canada Pastor Stephen Boissoin was fined $ 7,000, ordered to publicly apologize, and forbid to express his views on homosexuality in any public forum. His crime? He wrote a letter to the editor, criticizing the gay-indoctrination of kids as young as 5 in Canada schools.
Scott Eckern, artistic director of a California Musical Theater, was boycotted and forced to resign for donating 1000 dollars to the traditional marriage cause on the basis of his religious beliefs.
e-harmony.com, a Christian-based matchmaking organization, was forced to pay a total of 55,000 dollars and give free memberships to 10,000 gays, all because it refused to deviate from it's original business model of joining people for heterosexual marriages.
Materpiece Cake Shop in Colorado, faces death threats, slander, and boycotts just because the Christian owner refuses to bake gay-themed wedding cakes (although he will make any other sort of cake for a gay customer).
Seton Medical Center, a California Catholic hospital, had to pay $200,000 settlement for denying breast-augmentation surgery to a transexual patient on the grounds it violated their religious conscience to do so.
New Mexico Christian photography owner Elaine Huguenin, of Elane Photography, was forced to pay 6,600 dollars for refusing to photograph a lesbian civil committment ceremony.
In Michigan, Julea Ward was expelled from ther Counselling program for not wanting to give gay-affirming relationship counselling to a gay couple because it violated her Christian conscience. Ward referred the couple to another counsellor at the University, but was still expelled. In a separate case, almost exactly the same thing happened when a North Mississippi Health Services mental health counsellor, Sandra Bruff, was fired for this same conflict of her religious conscience.
In Lexington Ky, Apparel company Hands On Originals is being sued for declining to print up the t-shirts for the gay pride parade there, but referring the clients to someone who would at the same price. They are now being sued, as well as having a massive, organized boycott against them, orchestrated by that city's gay activist Mayor.
Boy Scouts of America. After affirming traditional values by excluding open homosexuality, the powerful gay lobby and the has put forth an aggressive, militant effort to public pressure on any organization that supports the scouts to drop them. The Scouts are now being routinely denied financial contributions and denied use of facilities and other services they once had access to, and being the target of aggressive slander, public ridicule, and organized blacklisting and boycotting.
Jim Walder of the TimberCreek bed-and-breakfast, is being sued for declining to host a gay civil unions ceremony at his privately-owned business on the basis of his religious beliefs. In almost exactly similar cases, Christians Les and Susan Molnar were fined $4,500, forced to close their B&B (Located inside their home) for refusing accomodations to a gay couple because allowing homosexual relations inside their home violated their Christian consciences. The exact same scenario played out in Hawaii in 2011, when Aloha Bed and Breakfast's Christian owner Phillis Young was sued for denying a single-bed room to a gay couple, her business also located inside her private home.
Angela McCaskill, a deaf African-American and 23-year veteran of Gallaudet University, was put on Adminsistative leave by the University's President after it was learned that McCaskill signed a petition at her church to put Maryland's same-sex marriage law up to voters. The gay self-appointed arbitors of "tolerance" - even a disabled Black female will not be spared their wrath.
Gay British actor, Rupert Everett, had to seek help from police for death threats after he made a comment that he "...could think of nothing worse than being brought up by two gay dads."
New york Senator Ruben Diaz was forced to seek help from the F.B.I for death threats he was getting, and for aggressive demonstrations at his house, along with family members being stalked - all for being the lone Democratic holdout on an affirmative gay marriage vote in that state.
David Parker of Massechusettes was ruled against by that State's Supreme Court when he protested not having the right to be notified of, and opt out his kindergarten son of gay-affirming lessons at school. Parker was thrown in jail and spent over $200,000 in legal expenses only to be ruled against. The precedent that the Court cited for ruling against him - justifying gay lessons to kindergarteners? -Gay marriage.
Matt Barber, fired from a Fortune 400 company (Allstate's Corporate Security Division) for writing an article on his own time, on his own computer, critical of promoting homosexuality.
Pastor Scott Lively, of the Oregon Citizen Alliance, was sued for 22,000 dollars in 1991 for using lawfully-permitted force to eject a trespasser from a private meeting of their group, simply carrying a lesbian over the threshold of the door, sitting her down, and shutting her out of the room.
Six years ago, Robert J. Smith was fired from his job on the board of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority for speaking against homosexuality. Smith was a regular panelist on a show in the D.C. area. One day he made the mistake of telling listeners how he truly felt about the issue of homosexuality. "Homosexual behavior, in my view, is deviant," he said. "I'm a Roman Catholic."
In 2002, Swedish Pastor Ake Green was jailed for 30 days for giving a sermon critical of homosexuality.
New Mexico Governor Susanah Martinez was refused service at Antonio's Hair Studio for having made previous comments to the media against gay marriage.
Senator Stacey Campfield was refused service and kicked out of a restaurant, The Bistro at the Bijou, for having previously made comments critical of homosexuality.
Famous boxer Manny Pacquiao was banned from a Los Angeles shopping mall, the "Grove", where he later had a promotional appearance planned, for communicating his opposition to gay marriage, citing his Christian beliefs.
Recently "tolerance" cost Christian Vermont Innkeepers 30,000 dollars because their Christian beliefs kept them from hosting a same-sex wedding at their Inn, not to mention legally forbidding them from hosting future straight weddings.
Former Lesbian-turned-Christian Lisa Miller was forced to embark on a life as an International fugitive for refusing to grant a court order to give her former lesbian Civil Union partner visitations to Miller's 7-yr-old daughter. Her ex-partner had no relation to the child. The Civil Union was from Vermont, not Virginia - where Miller and child moved to, and Virginia did not recognize those arrangements. Activists Judges in vermont awarded sole custody to the child to Miller's jilted lover back in Vt., so Now Lisa Miller must flee American Justice or lose custody of her daughter. Gay "marriage" hurts noone, right? Lisa Miller didn't get that memo.
In recent years, OK Rep. Sally Kern, after making comments about the harm in mainstreaming and enshrining homosexuality, had to enlist a State Trooper as her bodyguard after recieving death threats. In addition, she also had to endure telephone/email harassment, and gay activists and media outlets embarked on an elaborate smear campaign slandering members of her family, and also began slandering her to her business contacts :http://www.wnd.com/2008/03/59355/
U. Nebraska football coach Ron Brown has endured excessive harrassment and slander for communicating the Bible's stance against homosexuality to City Council members at a hearing to decide a gay/transgender student bill.
Damian Goddard, a Hockey broadcaster on Rogers Sportsnet, was recently fired because he wrote a tweet vocalizing support for some other person's stance in support for traditional marriage: http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/damian-goddard-fired-from-rogers-sportsnet_b87658
The stack of bodies on this 'altar' of gay "rights" grows higher and higher. Just days ago, Red Cross Employee Michael Hartman was fired for, what all evidence shows, emailing his co-workers criticizing the company policy that it's employees "celebrate" gay pride month. On the Red Cross' "diversity page" it said, “Everyone must ‘walk the talk’ of total diversity [sic]"
"Ten minutes after I sent the email protesting Gay Pride Month, my computer was shut down and a supervisor marched me out of my office.".
Heads of the Company insist his firing "...had to be for some other reason".
Michael Hartman is digging in his heals to fight this, and to expose the dark side of company-mandated celebration of "diversity" that goes on everywhere. Story here: http://chalcedon.edu/research/articles/red-cross-fires-christian-who-opposed-gay-pride-month/
Our next inclusion to this victim list is MMA fighter Matt Mitrione. Mitrione, in an unguarded moment of candor, unleashed a rant against fellow MMA fighter "Fallon Fox" - a man who says he's a woman, who fights women in the ring.
Mittrione didn't mince words, and very mean-spiritedly criticized Fox. Mittrione was immediately suspended, and leveled an enormous fine, and is now ordered to do volunteer work with LGBT youths.
Folks, it's not against the law to be mean-spirited. Or to say hurtful things. As long as a threat is not included, and as long as the legal process does not show that you damaged that persons career or livelihood by the criticism, you are allowed to say mean things. It's called "free speech".
When it comes to LGBT persons, hurting somebody's feelings becomes a federal crime.
Just this year, Barronelle Stutzman of Arlene's Flowers was sued by the Attorney General of the State of Washington for refusing to design a floral arrangement for a gay wedding. Washington, which has gay marriage and that omnipresent, overreaching LGBT "nondiscrimination" law, has religious liberties there in an iron grip. Stutzman, who's had gay employees in the past and many gay customers, refused to do that one order for that repeat customer (of 9 years). Stutzman declined the order because it violates her Christian faith by being forced to use her talents to endorse and celebrate same-sex marriage. http://m.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=40334&ref=bpnews-rssfeed0517
And here, another warm body is placed upon the altar of gay "rights" http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/02/02/artie-lange-chris-culliver-san-francisco-49ers-super-bowl/1886015/
San Francisco 49ers player Chris Culliver is being forced by the League to undergo "sensitivity training" and volunteer work with gay youths because of some remarks he made last year, critical of having homosexual players in the same locker room as him. The remarks were made after Comedian Artie Lange asked him if he'd ever pursue guys:
"I don't do the gay guys, man. I don't do that," Culliver said during the 1-minute taped interview. "Ain't got no gay people on the team. They gotta get up outta here if they do. Can't be with that sweet stuff."
The N.F.L. is a hyper-masculine bastion -a symbol- of American ruggedness and toughness. The brash, raw, untamed spirit that makes people like Chris Culliver speak his mind are the same virtues that make the N.F.L. It's a climate of warriors with warrior mentalities which the male gender rallies behind in the spirit of ruggedness. Open homosexuality is the antithesis of everything the N.F.L. stands for - and indeed, the antithesis of the rugged, warrior menatlity, which as we see, has just been shored up and sissified to suit the political correctness police. Same as has been done with America's Military, same as the effort at sissifying the boy scouts. God help us all from this gaystapo juggernaut.
In late 2011, a Macy's store employee was fired for telling a cross-dressing man not to change in the woman's fitting room: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2011/12/texas-macys-employee-fired-for-allegedly-violating-stores-lgbt-policy/
Recently, University of Toledo employee Crystal Dixon, a black female employee in the Human Resources division, was fired for writing a letter to the editor of a newspaper, sharing her views that homsexuality is not analogous to race, and that people leave this lifestyle all the time.
“I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifesetyle are ‘civil rights victims.’ Here’s why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a black woman,”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/6th-circuit-diversity-trumps-religious-freedom/#x21Er4ukzecXhTxX.99
In a new trend, university "diversity" politics are stealing away people's freedom of speach.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize", French Philosopher Voltaire once wrote. Homosexuality in this country is so ostensibly rightious and holy, one cannot even criticize the talking points promoted by it's proponents, or you'll get fired. Or blacklisted. Slandered. Stalked. Vandalized. Or...(see gayharms.blogspot, under "Sacrificed on the altar of gay rights").
I mean, what other human condition is so rightious one cannot project ones own critical analyis of it's merits? NONE. Homosexuality is tearing apart our freedoms in this country, and people are forced to wear political correctness speech-impeding corks in their mouths to appease the thought police.
Several years ago, conservative radio and television personality Dr. Laura Schlessinger was beseiged by militant gay activists for her having mentioned the homosexuality-pedophilia link, and calling homosexuality a biological error.
These activists waged an aggressive, sophisticated and mobilized web and media campaign to provoke public outrage and to blacklist Dr. Laura by continuously harrassing her sponsors, who retreated one by one. Her show was then cancelled after this continuous pressure, slander, and propaganda.
Singer and Actor Anita Bryant, a few decades ago, had her career sabatoged by the full public wrath of gay activist community in Florida. They successfully blacklisted the corporation she was the Spokeswoman for, as well as vandalizing her home, stalking her and her family, and making death threats and kidnapping threats to her and her kids. Bryant had been actively outspoken in local Politics, and actively outspoken against the promotion of homosexuality in society and in public schools.
Dr. Kenneth Howell, the adjunct professor at the University of Illinois who was fired for over 2 months before getting reinstated for teaching Catholic doctrine regarding homosexuality in a class he taught on Catholicism. Howell had sent an email to all his students clarifying Catholic position on this issue, leading to his firing.
Former Miss California, Carrie Prejean, was relentlessly harrassed, slandered and ridiculed for her openly Christian beliefs, to the culmination of her ultimately being fired. All this, from the perspective of anybody with a brain, stems back to her running for Miss U.S.A., when she was set up by a homosexual judge with a gay marriage question, and her not giving the politically correct answer. http://www.wnd.com/2009/06/100797/
Elsewhere, gay activists opponents in California's Prop 8 were subjected to aggressive and irresponsible blacklisting. The names of all who supported Prop 8 were aggressively, gratuitiously and garishly publicized to emplore gay activists to harrass, stalk, prank-call, slander, and character-assassinate them, often sabatoging their businesses connections and livelihood. These Brownshirt, Facist tactics have now struck fear into anyone who wishes to sign petitions or submit anything else in opposition to California gay marriage.
Dr Chuck Mcilhenny, a pastor and author of "When the Wicked Seize a City" many years ago in San francisco, found himself and his family the target of unrelenting harassment and vandalism to his home and church -around-the-clock telephone harassment, death threats to him, rape threats to his 3 young girls, and even getting his home firebombed while he and his family were inside sleeping.
In 1993, also in San Francisco, a large group of militant, disorderly gays and gay activists descended in and around Hamilton Square Baptist Church, accosting, grabbing and harrassing parishoners, causing a riot after area homosexual publications prodded and provoked gays to stage a protest there to protest the guest arrival of Pastor Lewis Sheldon. The gay mob proceded pushing on and surrounding people entering and leaving, scratching them, throwing rocks at them and church property, screaming menacingly at children, blocking and occupying the outside entrance, even raising a gay flag up the church's flag pole. Frightened church members had to escape from a side entrance. This event provoked National outrage.
In conjunction with this event, Pastor Sheldon was to speak at a meeting at City Hall, and was spit on by one of the gays who attended, as well as having manure spread all over the his office at church. http://www.conservapedia.com/Hamilton_Square_Baptist_Church_Riot
In 2004 in Philadelphia, 11 people (including 2 women over 70) were arrested for peacefully reciting the gospel on the sidewalk next to a gay pride parade. All the charges, later dropped after public pressure.
This next story hits close to (this author's) home. In late-2011, a video went viral of a gay student ostensibly getting beaten for his homosexuality at Unioto high school in Chillicothe Ohio. After much publicity, the gay activists community unleashed the full wrath of the A.C.L.U. upon that small locale and forced radical changes in that school's policies regarding accomodation for gays. What was conveniently ommitted from all the news stories was the truth. I personally had elicited many online discussions to try to draw out the facts, as well as working with the alleged assailant's sister, and even recruiting another homosexual Unioto student to help in my efforts. I had a next-door neighbor and a close family member who attended school with the parties involved and actively socialized with the purported assailant, Levi Sever. That family member of mine, a bi-sexual male teenager, recounts his years of freindship with the alleged assailant, when they even welcomed yet another gay student in their small circle of friends.
In the online discussions, it became apparent that the video of the beating was doctored, and that the gay Unioto victim threw the first punch. After many weeks of alleged sexual harasssment, illegal voyeurism, frottage, and surreptitiously photographing the backsides of male students to include on his facebook site, the alleged assailant grew fed-up with the harassment and reacted violently. What ensued was a sordid legacy of lies and strong-arm tactics to both bury the truth and protect the lie, the lie that this was a hate crime. A different gay Unionto student was actively involved in a petition drive to clear the alleged assailants name. It has also been widely reported that right after the story broke, the alleged victim removed all the incrimitating evidence from his facebook page (no doubt aided by the fact that the co-owner of facebook is a homosexual). The alleged assailant was buried during these events, with his mother participating fully with authorities, naiively believing in American Justice, and now her son is guilty of a Hate Crime. The "victim" in this incident did not have to leave campus for medical treatment.
Much further down the road, an additional news story reported that the alleged victim parties involved were confronted in a restaurant with someone telling them " you are a disgrace to Chillicothe", only for them to call the police on that person for this straightforward excercise of their freedom of speech. No threats or any other disorder were associated with that incident.
In the following examples, Christians are being arrested for quietly praying or sharing the Gospel on the periphery of (not within) gay pride events. In Elmira, NY 2007, 7 Christians were arrested for disturbing the peace for merely standing quietly in prayer, faces down, near a gay pride event. Similarly, Witchita, KS Preacher Mark Holick was arrested for attempting to pray and hand out fliers on a public sidewalk that bordered a park hosting a gay pride event (after getting permission from the local P.D.) in June, 2007. Both of these cases involved dubious, ambiguous and controversial local City ordinances.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Letter to Lawmakers: the Destructive Nature of Employee Non-Discrimination Bills
Imagine:
your wife/girlfriend/daughter/granddaughter is finishing up at the gym and heads to the shower. In her sanctifiably-feminine retreat within that public facility, in her most private state, she is exposed to the sight of a man's penis.
Imagine:
your daughter/grandaughter/niece is finishing up practice in her school athletics program, and goes to her locker room to shower and get changed. What she could never have been prepared for was the sight of a male faculty member standing in the shower she was just about to get into. This "male", as it were, has surgically-augmented "breasts", and a penis to go with them. Fantasy scenario? Hardly: http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/college-allows-transgender-man-to-expose-himself-to-young-girls.html
Imagine:
a young female family member of yours has signed up for one of her school's athletic programs, only to find that she will be competing against "transgendered" boys- unfairly robust and physically dominating in relation to your young family member and the rest of her teammates. Perhaps she'll be knocked around hard on the basketball court by this robust male. Or perhaps manhandled in girls' wrestling.
Imagine:
Your young family member is about to meet the new teacher at their school. What they could never have been prepared for was the sight of a man in a dress, or a short-haired woman in men's attire. Far from learning a curriculum that day, their young minds cannot get over the bizarre sight masquerading before them, and they mostly snicker and mock quietly amongst themselves to this thoroughly-distracting spectacle, at the expense of their attention spans. Or perhaps it was an open homosexual teacher they met that day, proudly displaying photo frames of them and their same sex partner, as has happened in cases past, where gay and lesbians will openly display such photos, along with gay-affirming posters on the classroom walls.
Imagine:
a church legally forbid to deny a position within their church to aforementioned exemplars of immoral, "alternative" lifestyles (this is currently being voted on by National courts in conjunction with Federal employment nondiscrimination policies). Or perhaps, a Christian bookstore owner forced out of business for not hiring a cross-dressing employee.
These above cases have, and will be played out if employee nondiscrimination is affirmed. Even if they include some of their requested provisions initially taken out, they have an uncanny knack for forcing them back in at a later time, as experience has shown.
Dear Official,
you are being approached by proponents pushing LGBT employee nondiscrimination, who promote a superficially-coherent-and-logical rationale as it's merit; who fire off impressive amounts of communications to persuade you, and to distort the magnitude of their numbers.
LGBT employee nondiscrimination is, simply put, a solution in search of a problem. Think: affirmative action on steroids. For there have been no studies which conclusively prove a climate of lgbt discrimination in housing and employment.
I study the people lobbying these kinds of Nationwide efforts, and the reality of their motives is a world away from their stated rationale. They pay lip service to universal values and down-home sensibilities, replete with victim-card buzzwords. They, through the media, locate and enshrine gays who seem to exemplify and justify the need to pass the bills their pushing. So-and-so was slighted at work. Yes, maybe, BUT WHO HASN'T BEEN?
"The objection will be raised, and raised, and raised...that our ads are lies...Yes of course we know it....but it makes no difference that our ads are lies, not to us." - passage from "After the Ball", a book long considered the 'gay activists' bible', or 'the gay rights playbook'".
Within the gay community are a minority of activists - militant, counter-cultural renegades with deep roots originating in Marxism, occultism, and the Nazi Party. They are world-class propagandists, with the Media, Corporate America - and by extension, it's Politicians - in a serpentine strangle-hold. They are polished liars -public relations aces- and they purport to represent your constituents. Don't buy it. "Gay rights" are not "human rights". They are gratuitous, unnecessary provisions which serve to molly-coddle a tiny segment of the population, and bestow upon them superior rights by a process that ostracizes and abolishes free speech and religious liberty
Recently, a young black woman from San Antonio was fired from the Macy's she worked at for asking a cross-dressing man not to return back into the women's fitting room: http://www.christianpost.com/news/macys-fires-christian-worker-for-not-allowing-transgender-in-womens-fitting-room-64237/
As we speak, there is an active policy in Washington State permitting a cross-dressing man -penis and all- to move freely about a girls' and womens' locker room in the nude - a locker room used by girl swimmers as young as 6. He was originally reported to the police by horrified women in the locker room, but upon reviewing the ordinance, the police saw their hands were tied: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/transgender-man-may-continue-using-locker-room-with-six-year-old-girls/
As we speak, there is a "woman" MMA fighter (Fallon Fox) who is busting through the competition like nobodies business. Indeed, 'like nobodies business', because that "woman" had previously refused to disclose to the MMA and her opponents she had only recently been a "woman". [Side note: when UFC champion Matt Mitrione went on a rant criticizing Fox, calling her a freak who signed up to beat on women, he was suspended from fighting - indeed, this intolerant, free-speech-corking climate of political correctness has even the baddest of the bad deferentiallly walking on eggshells]. http://www.inquisitr.net/682032/transgender-mma-fighter-fallon-fox-wins-again-audience-boos/
And as we speak, in Massachusetts State schools and public facilities, there is a policy in place which grants male boys and faculty members full access to the girls'/womens' facilities, and vice-versa. They don't even have to have the surgery, only the declaration of "change", as is so often the case with these bills.
Our laws are designed for the prosperity of the masses, not the molly-coddling of the few. Homosexuals are estimated to only be about 3.5 % of the U.S. population, but in terms of sheer numbers of communications to lawmakers, the impression left is that they are an enormous constituency. They're not.
Scott Lively, the world's foremost expert on homosexuals' influence on the culture, had this to say about employee nondiscrimination-type bills,
" They're the seed that contains the tree of the entire homosexual agenda with all of its poisonous fruit."
What these bills essentially do is codify and enshrine homosexuality/transgenderism into an incontrovertible validation which would criminalize anyone's disagreement with it, codifying Christian bias into law. The architects of these bills will often shroud the malicious, overreaching aspects within dubious, deceptive phrasing/terminology. Don't be deceived. Read what's actually inside the bill, because they're tricky by design.
And that's what this gay movement is all about. Not just laws to reflect societal affirmation, but to punish people who dare disagree with them. The gay agenda could better be expressed as a "Christian-punishing agenda", or "morality deconstruction agenda".
People are getting fired for a tweet: one's expressing disapproval of homosexuality.
Oxford City soccer player, Lee Steele, also fired for anti-gay tweet.(Mind you, both of those are from U.K., who, people say, is way ahead of us on the gay "rights" issue.)
Rutgers Coach Mike Rice, fired for yelling anti-gay slurs at slacking players during practice.
CNN anchor Roland Martin was suspended for gay-critical tweets.
A Sprint Cup racing crewman, also fired for gay-critical tweet.
Brooklyn NY D.A. fired head of gang bureau over "homophobic" tweets.
Vodaphone just suspended one of their employees over "homophobic" tweet.
Our Constitution grants us freedom to say offensive things, so long as it's not a threat, and so long as it doesn't demonstrably damage a person's livelihood. It's called "freedom of speech", the one thing that separates us from intolerant dictatorships in the world.
What is it about this lifestyle which would merit anyone to disagree with it? Plenty.
The LGBT lifestyle is a demonstrably disordered lifestyle, so typified by a vast roll-call of destructive pathologies and proclivities. Higher rates of smoking, substance abuse, promiscuity, and impulsive behavior. Drastic overrepresentation in almost all sexually-transmitted diseases. For lesbians, higher rates of obesity and breast cancer, substance abuse and psychiatric problems. And with gay men, the fact which everyone hates to acknowledge the most - an overrepresentation in total cases of child molestation.
Suppose your son/daughter/neice/nephew/ grandchildren have to find housing when they go away to college. What LGBT nondiscrimination bills like this would ensure is, they couldn't refuse to cohabitate with persons who exemplify sexual deviancy and all the unhealthy behaviors and diseases it accompanies. Perhaps you've instilled good values in that loved one, and now they have no choice but to be privy to the unavoidable lewdness and sexual corruption that comes with the gay lifestyle. And what if you have an apartment building, rental property, or advertisement for a roomate to live with or in close quarters with your young relatives. LGBT non discrimination removes your ability to screen applicants who may exemplify the laundry list of unhealthy behaviors which come with the gay lifestyle.
Next, we have the issue of an LGBT persons who exhibit poor job performance. Yes, they are susceptible just as anyone else of being a screw-up at work. What non discrimination policies do is enshrine that employee to such a status that it is very, very difficult to fire them for fear of a lawsuit.
And far from being individuals with a fixed, permanent sexual identity, lgbt folks are abandoning the lifestyle all the time: Little Richard, for instance. Anne Heche. Sex and the City's Cynthia Nixon, to name a few ex-gays. Ellen DeGeneres used to date men.
This is very much a transitory, changeable lifestyle, which for that reason, hasn't the merits to alter public policy to accommodate it. There is no scientific evidence, no standard, to conclusively show a gay person is even gay, unlike blacks and females, for example, so how can you prove discrimination based on invisible characteristics of the purported victims?
Here, we have "Exhibit A" showing how nondiscrimination-type bills are ripe for abuse, with this Ohio homosexual suing his employer http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/08/21/720111/ohio-judge-recognizes-sexual-orientation-discrimination-under-title-vii/?mobile=nc .
This gay man was clearly too thin-skinned and hypersensitive, making him choose to skip days and just stay home because of his paranoid delusions, resulting in his firing for unexcused absences. Also, in Kentucky recently, a man named Kevin McCaffrey sued his employer for what he perceived to be a gay-discrimination firing. The company in that case had to make employee cutbacks for economic reasons.
These bills give this demographic a licence to punish the system anytime they feel uneasy out in the cold, cruel world. You can see the broad subjectivity in codifying the alleged abuse in this man's complaint. THIS is the type of frivolous lawsuit you can expect bogging down your local courts if you approve of employee nondiscrimination. For example, a current LGBT discrimination lawsuit against Exxon-Mobile, where much of the basis of the complaint fell upon the plaintiff's insistence that his employer made it a point to turn his gaze toward him anytime he verbalized disagreement with gay marriage. What we have, essentially, is a baseless assignment of blame(s), where lgbt employees feel jilted by some perceived slight, vibe or innuendo, and demand public policy codify this subjectively-interpreted feedback into the standard of law. Problem is, American Justice does not work that way - it demands more tangible, objective standards of evidence.
Also very troubling is that grey area: Christian-themed, Christian-based businesses who are not protected like a nonprofit Church might be in the exemptions clauses. Think - a Christian-based publishing company sued for not publishing a book affirming transsexualism.
Our Nation is of Judeo-Christian heritage- the inspiration behind the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. People of faith have never taken policies to affirm and enshrine exemplars of sexual immorality. As people of faith, we cannot affirm and promote certain indiscretions. Shrouded in some versions of these bills is language which would cause churches to lose tax exempt status for not allowing gay events at their church. Here are a couple of cases which confirm the damage in the wake of these types of bills:
http://www.texasgopvote.com/reclaim-education/attack-1st-amendment-and-religion-texas-school-punishes-boy-opposing-homosexuali-003330
And here, a ruputable Christian business is attacked for refusing their printing service for gay pride t-shirts: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/christian-t-shirt-company-faces-boycott-investigation-for-declining-service-to-gay-pride-group/
And here, implications relevant to these kinds of bills which punishes Christian Bed and Breakfast owners doing business out of their private homes [it should be noted that these business owners also reject cohabitation to unmarried straight couples]: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/19/bed-and-breakfast-owners-fined-for-turning-away-gay-couple/ , and here this conservative commentator gives the definitive analysis of how these kinds of bills affect everyone: http://www.frc.org/testimony/testimony-in-opposition-to-hr-3017-employment-non-discrimination-act [it should be noted that these business owners also reject cohabitation to unmarried straight couples]
What these types of bills achieve is render our Constitutional right to Freedom of Association -freedom to do business with like-minded people- null and void. It's like forcing PETA to hire the President of the American Cattle Association.
Dear Lawmaker,
I realize you may very well have a family member or an acquaintance who are homosexual or gender confused, but translating your feelings for them into legislative bias would be like voting to lower the local drinking age because of your loyalty to an alcohol-dependant 19-yr-old. Particularly on an issue such as this, which seeks to redefine the very foundation on which any society is built around - the nuclear family. Also, the redefining of gender roles to impressionable young children. And it's possible to love and affirm lgbt people you know without having to reinvent public policy to enshrine them. You may feel you are simply voting on a single-issue bill, but the nature of the gay lobby everywhere is like the incremental tightening of a noose - each action closes the circle more tightly, restricting more and more breathing, resulting in an oppressive climate of political correctness where everyone has to walk on egg shells. In this case, the prevention of people's Constitutional rights to freedom of association, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion - all things that have long been under siege -with varying degrees of success- by the incremental, non-stop lobbying by the gay "rights" people, a feverishly driven, implacable army of hedonistic revolutionaries, hell-bent on deconstructing this Nation's moral identity and re-casting it in their own sexually-freewheeling, morally-optional image. Just look at the gay pride parades - all the snapshots of outrageous excess, lewdness, nudity and crude and vulgar messages. When bills like non-discrimination become the law of the land, that scale of outrageous behavior will be applicable everywhere.
This lifestyle does not merit the same perks of the Civil Rights movement. Homosexuality has no tangible, scientifically-verifiable standard to distinguish it, only subjective self-reporting to form the basis of an "identity". There is no scientific evidence to conclusively show a gay person is even gay, unlike blacks and females, for example, so how can you prove discrimination based on invisible characteristics of the purported victims? What you're doing is legislating feelings into law, and by that standard, my imagination could come up with innumerable conceptions for which to demand changes in legal provisions to unjustly accommodate me and my subjective 'feelings'. But the law doesn't work that way.
Recently I saw yet another "family" out in public which was comprised of several young boys, a mother and her "partner". The "parents", as always seems to be the case, exuded dysfunctionality in their manner and behavior, and almost always overweight, covered in tattoos/piercing. The children with them had that look about them I've seen so often when witnessing these "families": a listless, wary, self-conscious look of embarrassment. Perhaps they never got the memo - the politically-correct, dishonest media propaganda which purports these "families" are as normal and healthy as all others. My heart grieves for these boys, who's identities will be built around the absence of a father. By design. Perhaps the Mark Regnerus study, the study showing such children fare worse in 77/80 developmental areas, will magically not apply to them.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Illinois Gay Marriage: A Clever Disguise for Tyranny
Dear Illinois Representitive
Your are being absolutely inundated with demands to vote affirmatively for gay marriage. This mad drive, both from gay activists and corporate entities must seem overwhelming to you, but just know this: they don't represent the will of your constituents.
"Might makes right", and the overfunding by these corporate entities pushing for gay marriage are here to set the standards of rightiousness, even if that means bypassing the Democratic process by bribing lawmakers and other forms of brute-force politics (Recently, in 2011, a gay activist went before the legislature and stated, 'it would be irresponsible to leave this issue in the hands of the voters." (!)
Gay activists are deranged zealots who's relentless drive has no logical stopping point, and they've shown that time and time again. They are drunk with power -absolutly mad- and will not stop for anything short of a radical, perverted overhauling of American society. They are proteges of their Marxist prophet, proteges of Saul Alinski, and the values and ethics they expouse are mere lip-service. They say they're fighting for "inclusiveness" and "tolerance" and "the same rights as everyone else", but their actual mission is a world apart from their stated rationale. They're tyrants with tunnel-vision intolerance.
Gay marriage is the ultimate sanctification, the ultimate Govt. stamp of approval of their lifestyle, a sanctifying recognition which normalizes it and criminalizes disapproval of it in the public square, and forces Christian business owners to violate their consciences by officially affirming exemplars of this lifestyle. It also enshrines these relationships to the same level as straight unions, thus requiring it to be presented as a normal alternative to kids in public schools. It is a Constitution-stomping agenda - a perverted, Orwellian nightmare.
There is so, so much to disapprove of. This lifestyle is typified by abyssmal degenerecy, profound dysfunction, and medical liabilities. It is typified by bizarre sexual practices, elevated levels of substance abuse and psychiatric disorders - a vast roll-call of destructive pathologies and proclivities. Gay activists have simply given up on the "born that way" pursuit, and indeed, evidence suggests that they are recruited into same-sex attraction by molestations in childhood. And this is NOT something with which to build a healthy identity around, and is NOT something with which to bestow the proud title of "marriage" upon. We've seen many studies finding children who are deprived of either a mother or father have turbulent, dysfunctional lives. Gay housholds deprive them of this by design. A recent Nationally representitive study of children reared in gay households revealed they fared worse in 77/80 developmental areas (Mark Regnerus, U. of Texas).
Likely even you, Lawmaker, have someone close to you who defines themself as gay. However, it is unethical to express your personal committment to them into irresponsible legislative bias, especially on something so deeply controversial and impactful - dealing with the redefining of morality, traditions, gender realities, and the definition of a family.
Our Government -or any government- seeks to steer it's People into conduct which it thinks is good, conduct which is productive. That's why it bestows marriage upon straight couples. By enshrining them, it promotes domestic stability and the best possible enviornments for harboring and raising the next generation. Governments don't grant marriage simply because the adults feel a certain way toward one and other. Gay unions are ALWAYS sterile, and should therefore not have access to these benefits and recognition.
I keep seeing where gay activists, in ungaurded moments of honesty, will actually admit that they don't pursue marriage for the white picket fence, but merely for political gains. And early in the gay rights movement, gays would profess openly the virutes of sexual freedom over family as the thing they wanted mainstreamed the most.
"Gay marriage is a political and legal calculus designed to punish christians", says Fox News contributor Matt Barber.
The gay marriage bill before you has little to do with the will of your Constituents, and everything to do with the Orwellian political takeover machine by an army of cultural renegades - the gay activists.
Your are being absolutely inundated with demands to vote affirmatively for gay marriage. This mad drive, both from gay activists and corporate entities must seem overwhelming to you, but just know this: they don't represent the will of your constituents.
"Might makes right", and the overfunding by these corporate entities pushing for gay marriage are here to set the standards of rightiousness, even if that means bypassing the Democratic process by bribing lawmakers and other forms of brute-force politics (Recently, in 2011, a gay activist went before the legislature and stated, 'it would be irresponsible to leave this issue in the hands of the voters." (!)
Gay activists are deranged zealots who's relentless drive has no logical stopping point, and they've shown that time and time again. They are drunk with power -absolutly mad- and will not stop for anything short of a radical, perverted overhauling of American society. They are proteges of their Marxist prophet, proteges of Saul Alinski, and the values and ethics they expouse are mere lip-service. They say they're fighting for "inclusiveness" and "tolerance" and "the same rights as everyone else", but their actual mission is a world apart from their stated rationale. They're tyrants with tunnel-vision intolerance.
Gay marriage is the ultimate sanctification, the ultimate Govt. stamp of approval of their lifestyle, a sanctifying recognition which normalizes it and criminalizes disapproval of it in the public square, and forces Christian business owners to violate their consciences by officially affirming exemplars of this lifestyle. It also enshrines these relationships to the same level as straight unions, thus requiring it to be presented as a normal alternative to kids in public schools. It is a Constitution-stomping agenda - a perverted, Orwellian nightmare.
There is so, so much to disapprove of. This lifestyle is typified by abyssmal degenerecy, profound dysfunction, and medical liabilities. It is typified by bizarre sexual practices, elevated levels of substance abuse and psychiatric disorders - a vast roll-call of destructive pathologies and proclivities. Gay activists have simply given up on the "born that way" pursuit, and indeed, evidence suggests that they are recruited into same-sex attraction by molestations in childhood. And this is NOT something with which to build a healthy identity around, and is NOT something with which to bestow the proud title of "marriage" upon. We've seen many studies finding children who are deprived of either a mother or father have turbulent, dysfunctional lives. Gay housholds deprive them of this by design. A recent Nationally representitive study of children reared in gay households revealed they fared worse in 77/80 developmental areas (Mark Regnerus, U. of Texas).
Likely even you, Lawmaker, have someone close to you who defines themself as gay. However, it is unethical to express your personal committment to them into irresponsible legislative bias, especially on something so deeply controversial and impactful - dealing with the redefining of morality, traditions, gender realities, and the definition of a family.
Our Government -or any government- seeks to steer it's People into conduct which it thinks is good, conduct which is productive. That's why it bestows marriage upon straight couples. By enshrining them, it promotes domestic stability and the best possible enviornments for harboring and raising the next generation. Governments don't grant marriage simply because the adults feel a certain way toward one and other. Gay unions are ALWAYS sterile, and should therefore not have access to these benefits and recognition.
I keep seeing where gay activists, in ungaurded moments of honesty, will actually admit that they don't pursue marriage for the white picket fence, but merely for political gains. And early in the gay rights movement, gays would profess openly the virutes of sexual freedom over family as the thing they wanted mainstreamed the most.
"Gay marriage is a political and legal calculus designed to punish christians", says Fox News contributor Matt Barber.
The gay marriage bill before you has little to do with the will of your Constituents, and everything to do with the Orwellian political takeover machine by an army of cultural renegades - the gay activists.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Gay Adoption Nightmare Stories
There has been a rash of gay adoptive parents molesting their adopted boys. Call it, 'where political correctness goes wrong'.
Just recently an Ohio adoptive father of 3 boys and a girl just plead guilty of molestating the boys and pimping them out to other gay men. The little girl, unharmed, of course.
http://victimsofgaybullying.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/homosexual-in-ohio-adopted-three-boys-to-rape/
Recently this gay male couple had just pleaded no contest to charges relating to sexually assaulting 2 of their NINE adopted boys, then 3 more of those boys came forward with accusations like "being raped over and over...with them taking turns".
Folks, this is the inevitable aftermath of "equality", where that slippery slope leads.
I think this is the face of the rationale against gay adoptions. Story here:
http://www.ctnow.com/news/connecticut/hartford/hc-glastonbury-harasz-wirth-sentencing-0406-20130405,0,1350267.story
And here we see a tidal wave of data showing how homosexality is drstically overrepresened in child molestation cases.
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/chi...
And here, a 4-year-old boy is murdered by his lesbian parents because he refuses to call his butch-lesbian "father" dad. http://www.informationliberation.com/test.php...
Here, an adopted father is accused of raping boys and prostituting out a 10-year-old adopted son of his:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57389197/police-ohio-man-prostituted-adopted-son-10/
And here, Associate director of Duke University's Center for Health Policy was arrested by the FBI for admitting to molesting his 5-year-old adopted son, and offering the boy for sex to an undercover cop: http://www.rpvnetwork.org/profiles/blogs/gay-adoption-horror-duke
And here, a gay couple in Australia, Mark Newton and Peter Truong, celebrated in local media for their struggles in aquiring a son, are being sentenced for molesting the boy since 22 months of age, using him to make child porn, and attempts to pimp him out to other men for sex - in Australia and far away countries.
"We decided that we would have a child, that it was time for us to have a family," Newton and Truong told ABC. "We wanted to experience the joys of fatherhood." http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/model-gay-adoptive-fathers-sexually-abused-6-year-old-for-years-offered-him
One of the demands that was part of the 1972 Gay March on Washington was "the repeal of all age of consent laws".
And it has been brought to light that in a San Francisco gay publication, it was very common to find classified ads for anatomically correct child boy dolls.
Just recently an Ohio adoptive father of 3 boys and a girl just plead guilty of molestating the boys and pimping them out to other gay men. The little girl, unharmed, of course.
http://victimsofgaybullying.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/homosexual-in-ohio-adopted-three-boys-to-rape/
Recently this gay male couple had just pleaded no contest to charges relating to sexually assaulting 2 of their NINE adopted boys, then 3 more of those boys came forward with accusations like "being raped over and over...with them taking turns".
Folks, this is the inevitable aftermath of "equality", where that slippery slope leads.
I think this is the face of the rationale against gay adoptions. Story here:
http://www.ctnow.com/news/connecticut/hartford/hc-glastonbury-harasz-wirth-sentencing-0406-20130405,0,1350267.story
And here we see a tidal wave of data showing how homosexality is drstically overrepresened in child molestation cases.
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/chi...
And here, a 4-year-old boy is murdered by his lesbian parents because he refuses to call his butch-lesbian "father" dad. http://www.informationliberation.com/test.php...
Here, an adopted father is accused of raping boys and prostituting out a 10-year-old adopted son of his:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57389197/police-ohio-man-prostituted-adopted-son-10/
And here, Associate director of Duke University's Center for Health Policy was arrested by the FBI for admitting to molesting his 5-year-old adopted son, and offering the boy for sex to an undercover cop: http://www.rpvnetwork.org/profiles/blogs/gay-adoption-horror-duke
And here, a gay couple in Australia, Mark Newton and Peter Truong, celebrated in local media for their struggles in aquiring a son, are being sentenced for molesting the boy since 22 months of age, using him to make child porn, and attempts to pimp him out to other men for sex - in Australia and far away countries.
"We decided that we would have a child, that it was time for us to have a family," Newton and Truong told ABC. "We wanted to experience the joys of fatherhood." http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/model-gay-adoptive-fathers-sexually-abused-6-year-old-for-years-offered-him
One of the demands that was part of the 1972 Gay March on Washington was "the repeal of all age of consent laws".
And it has been brought to light that in a San Francisco gay publication, it was very common to find classified ads for anatomically correct child boy dolls.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Delaware Senate: Homosexual activists want to use marriage as a tool to force heightened social validation of homosexuality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8cQCi4ehXkg#! -the distilled version of why gay marriage harms society.
You have a gay marriage bill before you. Please take a moment to consider:
Craftily buried within the wording are overreaching, malicious provisions that would force faith groups to in fact do what the heading of the bill insists they wont, like, they can deny their facilities to gay couples ONLY if they deny renting their facilities out to ALL OTHER acctivities. And, they can deny them only if they don't mind losing their tax-exempt status. And they can deny the use of their facilities to gay ceremonies only if they don't mind losing their property tax-exempt status. Look at the bill, because all these provisions are in there, all nice and veilled for your protection.
I study the gay lobby, I know their tricks well. They're banking on local lawmakers capitulating to public pressure and not taking the time to fully understand the veilled provisions buried in this bill.
But more importantly, the issue of gay marriage is a moot one. As a rule, gays don't wed down. And finding that rare, celibate, committed, domestically-and-socially responsible gay couple down the street who just wants to marry their lifelong partner, well, those cases are as about as rare as finding an albino species of animal out in nature, and those are the cases as the Media depicts as the norm.
But also, the gay lobby is a massive, powerful juggernaut. They purport to desire marriage to gleam the same citizen benefits as regular married couples have, but you know what? Getting those things would be a cake-walk to this well-heeled political machine, and actually pair in comparison to the radical victories they've eeked out in our culture. Remember that one State recently that called it's gay civil unions bill "Everything But Marriage"? Well, that's exactly what it entailed.
Gay marriage codifies and sanctifies a demonstrably disordered lifestyle in such a way that abolishes Christians' right to dissaprove of it - with the freedom of conscience and freedom of association clauses written into the Constitution. Gays don't desire to wed down! The original philosophy behind the gay rights movement was sexual freedom w/o having to committ to a family. Gay marriage is just political leverage for the anti-social gay activists in their fascist drive to silence Christians and all other dissenters. In Massechusettes, Christian father David Parker was ruled against by that Supreme Court in his demands that he could opt out his kindergarten son from pro-gay lessons at school. The court cited that state's gay marriage statute as why no public school student can be exempt from pro-gay presentations/materials there. Or the Va. mom Lisa Miller who briefly became a lesbian, travelled to Vt. to wed, returned to VA, became a Christian and left homosexuality, and because of gay marriage, the courts have given custody of that woman's daughter to her temporary lesbian partner, and now that mom and daughter are international fugitives from justice because they refused to comply. But not only that, courts are bogged down everywhere because of all the frivilous lawsuits stemming from all the Constitutional grey areas caused by gay marriage, proving that you must impose it on everyone, or it hopelessly sabatoges the legal system.
For gay activists, gay marriage is the most important cog in their totalitarian, Fascist cultural takeover machine - efforts that were specifically mapped, scripted, and delineated in "The Gay Activists' Playbook" (After the Ball' 1988)
The gay rights movement is but a cover story for the Fascist takeover they've so hinted at but won't outright admit, and the central element to the path forward? Access to the title of Marriage.
Karl Marx once wrote, that the best way to take down a nation is to destroy the traditional family, and that's what gay marriage achieves: hopelessly blurring gender roles, keeping children fatherless/motherless by design. And let us not forget the recent Mark Regnerus study which revealed that adult children raised from gay households fared worse in 77/80 developmental areas, and a study showed children from these types of households are many times more likely to become homosexuals themselves.
And let us not forget the abyssmal degeneracy and decadence that parallels the lives of those who adopt homosexual identities: all the extreme levels of STDs, substance abuse, psychiatric disorders, domestic violence, and consistent backgrounds of childhood sex abuse and lifestyle calamities. And drawn from this pool are handpicked poster children that the HRC parades to the media as "with-it", gay couples who could put most straight marriages to shame. This phenomenon is just like a farmer with an orchard of pest-ravaged fruit trees carefully selecting the very few unmarked apples and then telling everyone how good his yield will be. Finding marriage-worthy, domestically stable gay couples is akin to finding an albino specimen in the animal kingdom.
I read up on the gay lobby always. I read up on their appearances on legislative floors crying rivers of crocodile tears and pushing phony and exaggerated victimhood narratives. They truly subscribe to that Alinsky philosophy: "By any means necessary".
Lastly, our Country is barreling toward the fiscal cliff. What gay marriage achieves is accelerates greatly our advancement toward the edge of the moral cliff.
This blogger that I've come across puts it brilliantly, much better than I could ever do:
"The issue is not whether marriage benefits and recognition can be extended to homosexual couples; the issue is whether they should be. There is no constitutional right to the idea of "homosexual marriage." The basis of this political campaign seems to be emotional blackmail and bullying, rather than anything substantively rational.
Why would the state want to grant marriage benefits and recognition to the sterile unions of homosexual couples?? What benefit to society could be so great as to warrant benefits to all such couples in return?
There is none.
Marriage is not a "benefits soup kitchen" for couples, and it is not about love (although love helps). Marriage is a longstanding institution centered on children and used by the state to regulate procreation and child rearing. Note the licensing and myriad rules and benefits involved. Note the recording of marriages in every courthouse across this huge country. The notion that the state goes to all that effort to regulate love is an utterly ridiculous myth, largely perpetrated by the entertainment industry.
The state awards marriage benefits to heterosexual couples because their unions — in principle, as a class — create the best situation for procreation and child rearing, which is a huge public interest. Procreation is not required in each and every instance; it is anticipated from the class.
The state does this without regard for incidental infertility or contraception — because (1) the overwhelming majority of married couples do have children, and (2) the state is constitutionally prohibited from screening all couples for fertility — because that would violate the medical privacy of couples. (See Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965.)
In sharp contrast, homosexual couples can neither create children nor raise them with gender complementarity. They are biologically incapable of fulfilling the implicit quid pro quo that is the political institution of marriage. Their unions are all sterile, and they cannot provide both a mother and a father for children.
1. Homosexual activists want to use marriage as a tool to force heightened social validation of homosexuality. The "lost" revenue from "gay weddings" is a ridiculous pittance by comparison.
2. Gay activists will often parrot the infertility canard when they claim that the state cannot regulate a behavior (procreation and biological parenting, in this case) without requiring that behavior. That's arrant nonsense — because it is common practice for the state to provide incentives for outcomes without necessarily requiring the desired behavior in each and every instance. As just one example of thousands, when the state wants to increase the number of specialists in a certain field, it offers college scholarships to students without requiring them to actually get a job in that field when they graduate.
3. Marriage is much more than a simple contractual arrangement between two people. It's the foundation, the bedrock, from which harbors and provides for the future generation(s) of Citizens. Like a protective cocoon, it fosters the optimal environment for responsible procreation and childrearing - both of which sterile gay couples are exempt.
5. As far as the gay adoption aspect goes, men and women are not interchangeable parts. That androgynous ideological premise is refuted by basic biology.
7The ideological core of the campaign for "homosexual marriage" is cultural Marxism, which is inherently authoritarian."
You have a gay marriage bill before you. Please take a moment to consider:
Craftily buried within the wording are overreaching, malicious provisions that would force faith groups to in fact do what the heading of the bill insists they wont, like, they can deny their facilities to gay couples ONLY if they deny renting their facilities out to ALL OTHER acctivities. And, they can deny them only if they don't mind losing their tax-exempt status. And they can deny the use of their facilities to gay ceremonies only if they don't mind losing their property tax-exempt status. Look at the bill, because all these provisions are in there, all nice and veilled for your protection.
I study the gay lobby, I know their tricks well. They're banking on local lawmakers capitulating to public pressure and not taking the time to fully understand the veilled provisions buried in this bill.
But more importantly, the issue of gay marriage is a moot one. As a rule, gays don't wed down. And finding that rare, celibate, committed, domestically-and-socially responsible gay couple down the street who just wants to marry their lifelong partner, well, those cases are as about as rare as finding an albino species of animal out in nature, and those are the cases as the Media depicts as the norm.
But also, the gay lobby is a massive, powerful juggernaut. They purport to desire marriage to gleam the same citizen benefits as regular married couples have, but you know what? Getting those things would be a cake-walk to this well-heeled political machine, and actually pair in comparison to the radical victories they've eeked out in our culture. Remember that one State recently that called it's gay civil unions bill "Everything But Marriage"? Well, that's exactly what it entailed.
Gay marriage codifies and sanctifies a demonstrably disordered lifestyle in such a way that abolishes Christians' right to dissaprove of it - with the freedom of conscience and freedom of association clauses written into the Constitution. Gays don't desire to wed down! The original philosophy behind the gay rights movement was sexual freedom w/o having to committ to a family. Gay marriage is just political leverage for the anti-social gay activists in their fascist drive to silence Christians and all other dissenters. In Massechusettes, Christian father David Parker was ruled against by that Supreme Court in his demands that he could opt out his kindergarten son from pro-gay lessons at school. The court cited that state's gay marriage statute as why no public school student can be exempt from pro-gay presentations/materials there. Or the Va. mom Lisa Miller who briefly became a lesbian, travelled to Vt. to wed, returned to VA, became a Christian and left homosexuality, and because of gay marriage, the courts have given custody of that woman's daughter to her temporary lesbian partner, and now that mom and daughter are international fugitives from justice because they refused to comply. But not only that, courts are bogged down everywhere because of all the frivilous lawsuits stemming from all the Constitutional grey areas caused by gay marriage, proving that you must impose it on everyone, or it hopelessly sabatoges the legal system.
For gay activists, gay marriage is the most important cog in their totalitarian, Fascist cultural takeover machine - efforts that were specifically mapped, scripted, and delineated in "The Gay Activists' Playbook" (After the Ball' 1988)
The gay rights movement is but a cover story for the Fascist takeover they've so hinted at but won't outright admit, and the central element to the path forward? Access to the title of Marriage.
Karl Marx once wrote, that the best way to take down a nation is to destroy the traditional family, and that's what gay marriage achieves: hopelessly blurring gender roles, keeping children fatherless/motherless by design. And let us not forget the recent Mark Regnerus study which revealed that adult children raised from gay households fared worse in 77/80 developmental areas, and a study showed children from these types of households are many times more likely to become homosexuals themselves.
And let us not forget the abyssmal degeneracy and decadence that parallels the lives of those who adopt homosexual identities: all the extreme levels of STDs, substance abuse, psychiatric disorders, domestic violence, and consistent backgrounds of childhood sex abuse and lifestyle calamities. And drawn from this pool are handpicked poster children that the HRC parades to the media as "with-it", gay couples who could put most straight marriages to shame. This phenomenon is just like a farmer with an orchard of pest-ravaged fruit trees carefully selecting the very few unmarked apples and then telling everyone how good his yield will be. Finding marriage-worthy, domestically stable gay couples is akin to finding an albino specimen in the animal kingdom.
I read up on the gay lobby always. I read up on their appearances on legislative floors crying rivers of crocodile tears and pushing phony and exaggerated victimhood narratives. They truly subscribe to that Alinsky philosophy: "By any means necessary".
Lastly, our Country is barreling toward the fiscal cliff. What gay marriage achieves is accelerates greatly our advancement toward the edge of the moral cliff.
This blogger that I've come across puts it brilliantly, much better than I could ever do:
"The issue is not whether marriage benefits and recognition can be extended to homosexual couples; the issue is whether they should be. There is no constitutional right to the idea of "homosexual marriage." The basis of this political campaign seems to be emotional blackmail and bullying, rather than anything substantively rational.
Why would the state want to grant marriage benefits and recognition to the sterile unions of homosexual couples?? What benefit to society could be so great as to warrant benefits to all such couples in return?
There is none.
Marriage is not a "benefits soup kitchen" for couples, and it is not about love (although love helps). Marriage is a longstanding institution centered on children and used by the state to regulate procreation and child rearing. Note the licensing and myriad rules and benefits involved. Note the recording of marriages in every courthouse across this huge country. The notion that the state goes to all that effort to regulate love is an utterly ridiculous myth, largely perpetrated by the entertainment industry.
The state awards marriage benefits to heterosexual couples because their unions — in principle, as a class — create the best situation for procreation and child rearing, which is a huge public interest. Procreation is not required in each and every instance; it is anticipated from the class.
The state does this without regard for incidental infertility or contraception — because (1) the overwhelming majority of married couples do have children, and (2) the state is constitutionally prohibited from screening all couples for fertility — because that would violate the medical privacy of couples. (See Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965.)
In sharp contrast, homosexual couples can neither create children nor raise them with gender complementarity. They are biologically incapable of fulfilling the implicit quid pro quo that is the political institution of marriage. Their unions are all sterile, and they cannot provide both a mother and a father for children.
1. Homosexual activists want to use marriage as a tool to force heightened social validation of homosexuality. The "lost" revenue from "gay weddings" is a ridiculous pittance by comparison.
2. Gay activists will often parrot the infertility canard when they claim that the state cannot regulate a behavior (procreation and biological parenting, in this case) without requiring that behavior. That's arrant nonsense — because it is common practice for the state to provide incentives for outcomes without necessarily requiring the desired behavior in each and every instance. As just one example of thousands, when the state wants to increase the number of specialists in a certain field, it offers college scholarships to students without requiring them to actually get a job in that field when they graduate.
3. Marriage is much more than a simple contractual arrangement between two people. It's the foundation, the bedrock, from which harbors and provides for the future generation(s) of Citizens. Like a protective cocoon, it fosters the optimal environment for responsible procreation and childrearing - both of which sterile gay couples are exempt.
5. As far as the gay adoption aspect goes, men and women are not interchangeable parts. That androgynous ideological premise is refuted by basic biology.
7The ideological core of the campaign for "homosexual marriage" is cultural Marxism, which is inherently authoritarian."
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Sound, Irrefutable Evidence of Gay Self-Destruction
This compiled information is from earstohear.net in a blog called "Consequences of Sodomy". The author is seen railing against the politically-correct public's embrace and promotion of homosexuality in the face of the glaring medical evidence showing how harmful it is. As a disclaimer I would like to note that this author's continual branding of gays as "Sodomites" is very coarse and insensitive, but the medical literature he/she quotes speaks for itself. Very informative blog:
Why doesn't the mainstream media report these FACTS? The increase in children being born out of wedlock in Scandinavia since marriage was redefined! William Murray, the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, warns of the dangers of legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. He says Scandinavia has had nearly a decade of legal homosexual marriage, and it has nearly destroyed the institution of marriage altogether. More details: http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/132004c.asp (See more facts at Lifestyle Consequences of homosexuals.
The High Cost of Aids - The James Hartline Report On The Frontlines of the Culture War January 29, 2007 - The Great Rainbow Robbery: Gay Activists Costing America Billions Of Dollars In Medical Expenses To Pay For Unsafe Sex Practices
-----Original Message-----
From: DFJosephMD@aol.com [mailto:DFJosephMD@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:08 AM
To: DFJosephMD@aol.com
Subject: People should hand out flyers, exposing sodomites
To the following article, I would like to add -- the reason sodomites are prone to a myriad of infections and an early death is because the lining of the rectum was made by God for one purpose only -- to rid the body of waste.
The lining of the vagina is tough, like the skin on our hands, so it can withstand the trauma of intercourse and child bearing, but the lining of the anus is too delicate to withstand any trauma.
Anal intercourse, penile or otherwise, traumatizes the soft tissues of the rectal lining. As a consequence, the lining of the rectum is almost always traumatized to some degree by any act of anal intercourse. Even in the absence of major trauma, minor or microscopic tears in the rectal lining allow for immediate contamination and the entry of germs into the bloodstream."
Furthermore, comparable tears in the vagina are not only less frequent because of the relative toughness of the vaginal lining, but the environment of the vagina is vastly cleaner than that of the rectum. Indeed, we are designed with a nearly impenetrable barrier between the bloodstream and the extraordinarily toxic and infectious contents of the bowel.
Anal intercourse creates a breach in this barrier for the receptive partner, whether or not the insertive partner is wearing a condom."
In addition to the trauma of intercourse, semen can eat away at the intestinal lining. This allows a person to "infect themselves" as the bacteria from their feces enter the blood stream.
As a result of this, a man is 2,700 times more likely to get an HIV infection from anal intercourse than he is from vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse is so dangerous, the United Kingdom Blood Transfusion Service will not accept blood from any man who has ever had sex with another man, even if they were practicing 'safe sex' with a condom.
Regarding safe sex, even condom manufacturers advise against anal intercourse. The condom company, Durex, said in October 2000 : "Anal intercourse is a high-risk activity because of the potential for infection from STDs including HIV transmission. Currently, there are no specific standards for the manufacture of condoms for anal sex. Current medical advice is therefore to avoid anal sex..
Ah, but our schools say it's normal.
One study calculated that 32% of condoms broke and 21% slipped during anal intercourse. The researchers pointed out that "condoms manufactured in the United States generally are labeled "for vaginal use only."
Would you believe that our Supreme Court struck down Texas' anti-sodomy law?
In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote that the sodomy law "demeans the lives of homosexual persons" and that homosexuals "are entitled to respect for their private lives."
"The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime," Kennedy said.
This majority opinion makes no sense at all. Of course the state constantly interferes with people's privacy. Has Justice Kennedy ever heard of incest, pedophilia and bestiality? Or, how about calling a prostitute to come to your house? Are we now to assume that these can be done in private?
And how does it demean their lives? Who would have ever thought that trying to save lives would be considered a demeaning act? The only thing demeaning is the act, itself.
The Center for Disease Control warns that men who have sex with men can result in rapid, extensive transmission of sexually transmitted diseases."
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4835a1.htm
The Gay and Lesbian Medical Association confirmed these statistics in an article published by the homosexual advocacy website 'gaywired' in July 2002.
http://www.gaywired.com/storydetail.cfm?Section=76&ID=10732
Medical studies and other evidence indicate that individuals who engage in homosexual behavior experience dramatically higher risks of domestic violence, mental illness, substance abuse, life-threatening disease, multiple sex partners and premature death by up to 20 years.
College-aged men who engage in homosexual behavior are at risk of dying up to 20 years younger than other men, according to Oxford University's International Journal of Epidemiology, which reported: "Life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 20 years less than for all men -- nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 years will not reach their 65th birthday."
http://ije.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/657?maxtoshow=&HITS=10
"The probability of violence occurring in a gay couple is mathematically double the probability of that in a heterosexual couple," write the editors of the National Gay & Lesbian Domestic Violence Network newsletter.
The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that "people with same-sex sexual behavior are at greater risk for psychiatric disorders" - including bipolar, obsessive-compulsive, and anxiety disorders, major depression, and substance abuse.
http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/58/1/85
The Medical Institute of Sexual Health reports: "Homosexual men are at significantly increased risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.
Women who have sex with women are at significantly increased risk of bacterial vaginosis, breast cancer and ovarian cancer than are heterosexual women." (Executive Summary, "Health Implications
Associated with Homosexuality," 1999,
http://www.medinstitute.org
The Institute reports that "significantly higher percentages of homosexual men and women abuse drugs, alcohol and tobacco than do heterosexuals."
A Detroit homosexual newsmagazine columnist wrote regarding his partner: "This is his first relationship, so he has not yet been ruined by all the heartache, lies, deceit, and game-playing that are the hallmark of gay relationships...
Nine out of 10 gay men cheat on their lovers."
It is apparent that the six justices who voted to overturn the Texas law on sodomy were absolutely clueless, regarding the health risks. How is it possible that anyone with a modicum of intelligence
would willfully be a party to the proliferation of deadly bacteria and viruses?
Our founding fathers must be turning over in their graves. Nowhere in the Constitution is there even a suggestion that sodomy, or other perverse sex acts, or freedom to engage in them in private should be allowed.
On the contrary, these six justices made a mockery of the Constitution: You have to look no further than the Preamble:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Not only does this Court not promote the general welfare of our country. But they are party to its destruction. I guarantee that because of this decision, homosexuals will have a freer hand in public schools in their indoctrination efforts.
The above has come to pass.
After all - the Supreme Court gave its blessing, so it must be normal.
END RESULT: MORE SUFFERING AND DEATHS. THIS IS IRREFUTABLE.
As long as they are hell bent about discussing homosexuality in our schools, then why not give all the facts and let the students decide if they want to live a life of pain and suffering and an early death, or live a normal life.
How stupid of me -- I thought the sole purpose of schools was to EDUCATE -- not INDOCTRINATE.
From time to time, I like to send out an e-mail which was sent to me from one of my friends, a paramedic. Now, would be another one of those ideal times.
I ask you, does homosexuality deserve being embraced, or taught in our schools as just another normal alternative lifestyle, or should it be drop-kicked, along with satan, back to hell, where they came from?
Frank Joseph MD
DFjosephMD@aol.com
http://hometown.aol.com/dfjoseph/abortion.html
Subject: People should hand out flyers
Date: 4/14/2005 4:56:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: devvyk@earthlink.net
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/44524.htm
April 14, 2005 -- WHEN U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spoke Tuesday night at NYU's Vanderbilt Hall, "The room was packed with some 300 students and there were many protesters outside because of Scalia's vitriolic dissent last year in the case that overturned the Texas law against gay sex," our source reports. "One gay student asked whether government had any business enacting and enforcing laws against consensual sodomy. Following Scalia's answer, the student asked a follow-up: 'Do you sodomize your wife?' The audience was shocked, especially since Mrs. Scalia [Maureen] was in attendance. The justice replied that the question was unworthy of an answer."
* * * *
Groups should organize, stand outside these events and hand out flyers that contain factual information on what the medical industry calls "Lavender diseases." Those are the ones that sodomites and lesbians suffer from constantly.
Perhaps if some of these young folks on college campuses would see how filthy such sex is, it might change their minds about promoting such disease ridden "acts of love between consenting adults."
This is an excerpt from one of my old columns:
For those who have been influenced by "superstars" such as Cher and Elton John to "accept those of the gay lifestyle," here's a short laundry list of what sexual deviancy brings to the participant:
(Anal) Douches, Lubricants: Allergic reactions, Rectal fatty tumors Active Fellatio: Physical abrasions, Oral gonorrhea, Herpes progenitalis I and II, Nongonococcal pharyngitis (Chlamidia and others), Oral condyloma acuminatum, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Enteric diseases, Lymphogranuloma venereum,
Granuloma inquinale, Chancroid Passive Fellatio: Herpes type 1 and 2, Nongonococcol urethritis (Chlamidia and others), Gonorrhea, Neisseria meningitidis. Anal Intercouse, Active: Nongonococcol urethritis, Escherichia coli, Gonorrhea, Hepatitis A, B, non-A/non-B, Herpes, Warts -molluscum and condyloma, Syphilis, Trichomoniasis,
Epididymitis/prostatitis, Fungal infections, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus. Anal Intercouse, Passive: Physical protitis, Rectal gonorrhea, Warts -condyloma and molluscum (rare), Nonspecific proctitis (Chlamidia and others), Herpes, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Trichomoniasis, Corynebacterium,
Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus, Candidiasis. Analinction (dung-eating, "rimming"): Enteric diseases: Gay bowel syndrome (explained below) PLUS Escherichia coli and Helminthic parasites, Oral warts, Oral gonorrhea, Syphilis, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid. Fist/Finger Insertion,
Passive: Internal scrapes, Anal sphincter tears, Perforations of the colon, Acute abdomen, having to wear a diaper.
Toys/Apparatus: Allergic reactions, Friction dermatitis, Physical torsions, Varicoceles, Peyronie's disease, Fungal infections, Lost rectal objects, Testicular strangulation ("cock rings").
Gay Bowel Syndrome is a collection of bowel diseases which lead to dysfunction of the lower bowel tract and is prevalent throughout the "gay" community. GBS requires one wear a colostomy bag. Shigellosis is an acute bacteria infection like salmonellosis, it can lead to a diarrhea-induced dehydration death in infants and the elderly. Infected individuals [HIV] should never handle food, yet how many "gays" work in restaurants and handle food?
Hepatitus A and B - a viral liver disease spread by fecal contamination (A), or by blood (B). The latter type is considered to be transmitted "by 'parenteral injection' of saliva or semen positive for B antigen through breaks in anal or oral mucosa during anilingual (tongue/anus) contact or proctogenital intercouse (penile/rectal sodomy)" (New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, p.302.)
This is normal, natural and healthy?
Why doesn't the mainstream media report these FACTS? The increase in children being born out of wedlock in Scandinavia since marriage was redefined! William Murray, the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, warns of the dangers of legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. He says Scandinavia has had nearly a decade of legal homosexual marriage, and it has nearly destroyed the institution of marriage altogether. More details: http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/132004c.asp (See more facts at Lifestyle Consequences of homosexuals.
The High Cost of Aids - The James Hartline Report On The Frontlines of the Culture War January 29, 2007 - The Great Rainbow Robbery: Gay Activists Costing America Billions Of Dollars In Medical Expenses To Pay For Unsafe Sex Practices
-----Original Message-----
From: DFJosephMD@aol.com [mailto:DFJosephMD@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:08 AM
To: DFJosephMD@aol.com
Subject: People should hand out flyers, exposing sodomites
To the following article, I would like to add -- the reason sodomites are prone to a myriad of infections and an early death is because the lining of the rectum was made by God for one purpose only -- to rid the body of waste.
The lining of the vagina is tough, like the skin on our hands, so it can withstand the trauma of intercourse and child bearing, but the lining of the anus is too delicate to withstand any trauma.
Anal intercourse, penile or otherwise, traumatizes the soft tissues of the rectal lining. As a consequence, the lining of the rectum is almost always traumatized to some degree by any act of anal intercourse. Even in the absence of major trauma, minor or microscopic tears in the rectal lining allow for immediate contamination and the entry of germs into the bloodstream."
Furthermore, comparable tears in the vagina are not only less frequent because of the relative toughness of the vaginal lining, but the environment of the vagina is vastly cleaner than that of the rectum. Indeed, we are designed with a nearly impenetrable barrier between the bloodstream and the extraordinarily toxic and infectious contents of the bowel.
Anal intercourse creates a breach in this barrier for the receptive partner, whether or not the insertive partner is wearing a condom."
In addition to the trauma of intercourse, semen can eat away at the intestinal lining. This allows a person to "infect themselves" as the bacteria from their feces enter the blood stream.
As a result of this, a man is 2,700 times more likely to get an HIV infection from anal intercourse than he is from vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse is so dangerous, the United Kingdom Blood Transfusion Service will not accept blood from any man who has ever had sex with another man, even if they were practicing 'safe sex' with a condom.
Regarding safe sex, even condom manufacturers advise against anal intercourse. The condom company, Durex, said in October 2000 : "Anal intercourse is a high-risk activity because of the potential for infection from STDs including HIV transmission. Currently, there are no specific standards for the manufacture of condoms for anal sex. Current medical advice is therefore to avoid anal sex..
Ah, but our schools say it's normal.
One study calculated that 32% of condoms broke and 21% slipped during anal intercourse. The researchers pointed out that "condoms manufactured in the United States generally are labeled "for vaginal use only."
Would you believe that our Supreme Court struck down Texas' anti-sodomy law?
In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote that the sodomy law "demeans the lives of homosexual persons" and that homosexuals "are entitled to respect for their private lives."
"The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime," Kennedy said.
This majority opinion makes no sense at all. Of course the state constantly interferes with people's privacy. Has Justice Kennedy ever heard of incest, pedophilia and bestiality? Or, how about calling a prostitute to come to your house? Are we now to assume that these can be done in private?
And how does it demean their lives? Who would have ever thought that trying to save lives would be considered a demeaning act? The only thing demeaning is the act, itself.
The Center for Disease Control warns that men who have sex with men can result in rapid, extensive transmission of sexually transmitted diseases."
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4835a1.htm
The Gay and Lesbian Medical Association confirmed these statistics in an article published by the homosexual advocacy website 'gaywired' in July 2002.
http://www.gaywired.com/storydetail.cfm?Section=76&ID=10732
Medical studies and other evidence indicate that individuals who engage in homosexual behavior experience dramatically higher risks of domestic violence, mental illness, substance abuse, life-threatening disease, multiple sex partners and premature death by up to 20 years.
College-aged men who engage in homosexual behavior are at risk of dying up to 20 years younger than other men, according to Oxford University's International Journal of Epidemiology, which reported: "Life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 20 years less than for all men -- nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 years will not reach their 65th birthday."
http://ije.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/657?maxtoshow=&HITS=10
"The probability of violence occurring in a gay couple is mathematically double the probability of that in a heterosexual couple," write the editors of the National Gay & Lesbian Domestic Violence Network newsletter.
The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that "people with same-sex sexual behavior are at greater risk for psychiatric disorders" - including bipolar, obsessive-compulsive, and anxiety disorders, major depression, and substance abuse.
http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/58/1/85
The Medical Institute of Sexual Health reports: "Homosexual men are at significantly increased risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.
Women who have sex with women are at significantly increased risk of bacterial vaginosis, breast cancer and ovarian cancer than are heterosexual women." (Executive Summary, "Health Implications
Associated with Homosexuality," 1999,
http://www.medinstitute.org
The Institute reports that "significantly higher percentages of homosexual men and women abuse drugs, alcohol and tobacco than do heterosexuals."
A Detroit homosexual newsmagazine columnist wrote regarding his partner: "This is his first relationship, so he has not yet been ruined by all the heartache, lies, deceit, and game-playing that are the hallmark of gay relationships...
Nine out of 10 gay men cheat on their lovers."
It is apparent that the six justices who voted to overturn the Texas law on sodomy were absolutely clueless, regarding the health risks. How is it possible that anyone with a modicum of intelligence
would willfully be a party to the proliferation of deadly bacteria and viruses?
Our founding fathers must be turning over in their graves. Nowhere in the Constitution is there even a suggestion that sodomy, or other perverse sex acts, or freedom to engage in them in private should be allowed.
On the contrary, these six justices made a mockery of the Constitution: You have to look no further than the Preamble:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Not only does this Court not promote the general welfare of our country. But they are party to its destruction. I guarantee that because of this decision, homosexuals will have a freer hand in public schools in their indoctrination efforts.
The above has come to pass.
After all - the Supreme Court gave its blessing, so it must be normal.
END RESULT: MORE SUFFERING AND DEATHS. THIS IS IRREFUTABLE.
As long as they are hell bent about discussing homosexuality in our schools, then why not give all the facts and let the students decide if they want to live a life of pain and suffering and an early death, or live a normal life.
How stupid of me -- I thought the sole purpose of schools was to EDUCATE -- not INDOCTRINATE.
From time to time, I like to send out an e-mail which was sent to me from one of my friends, a paramedic. Now, would be another one of those ideal times.
Dear Doctor,
Your article was a splendid read. As a former fireman and paramedic for the city of San Francisco, I would be more than happy to provide you with anecdotal information regarding the lifestyle of the homosexual men and women; people who clog the EMS system with their strange and disgusting acts of sexual gratification. These acts not only cause infectious disease rates to skyrocket, but they are the source of traumatic injuries to the genital-urinary and lower intestinal tract. Some of these injuries are so severe, they often cause death to the individuals involved.
I was called to many residences and/or bath house for rectal bleeds. These bleeds were many times the result of the infamous homosexual act of "fisting." Many time we transported patients (in the Jackknife position) with such objects as zucchini, squash and cucumbers lodged in their rectums.
The San Francisco General Hospital has a surgical museum for surgical interns, nurses, other doctors and paramedics. The museum displays objects that have been surgically removed from gay men's intestinal tracts. Among these items are; light bulbs, bananas, rodents, batteries, Billy clubs, super-sized dildos, and a host of other objects that would make the stomach turn.
I had a younger brother (who was gay) who died from AIDS in 1986. No one can tell me that HIV hasn't affected me or my family. My brother was a good kid. He was molested when he was very young by some bastard.
Cordially,
Tom
SFFD (RET)
I ask you, does homosexuality deserve being embraced, or taught in our schools as just another normal alternative lifestyle, or should it be drop-kicked, along with satan, back to hell, where they came from?
Frank Joseph MD
DFjosephMD@aol.com
http://hometown.aol.com/dfjoseph/abortion.html
Subject: People should hand out flyers
Date: 4/14/2005 4:56:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: devvyk@earthlink.net
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/44524.htm
April 14, 2005 -- WHEN U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spoke Tuesday night at NYU's Vanderbilt Hall, "The room was packed with some 300 students and there were many protesters outside because of Scalia's vitriolic dissent last year in the case that overturned the Texas law against gay sex," our source reports. "One gay student asked whether government had any business enacting and enforcing laws against consensual sodomy. Following Scalia's answer, the student asked a follow-up: 'Do you sodomize your wife?' The audience was shocked, especially since Mrs. Scalia [Maureen] was in attendance. The justice replied that the question was unworthy of an answer."
* * * *
Groups should organize, stand outside these events and hand out flyers that contain factual information on what the medical industry calls "Lavender diseases." Those are the ones that sodomites and lesbians suffer from constantly.
Perhaps if some of these young folks on college campuses would see how filthy such sex is, it might change their minds about promoting such disease ridden "acts of love between consenting adults."
This is an excerpt from one of my old columns:
For those who have been influenced by "superstars" such as Cher and Elton John to "accept those of the gay lifestyle," here's a short laundry list of what sexual deviancy brings to the participant:
(Anal) Douches, Lubricants: Allergic reactions, Rectal fatty tumors Active Fellatio: Physical abrasions, Oral gonorrhea, Herpes progenitalis I and II, Nongonococcal pharyngitis (Chlamidia and others), Oral condyloma acuminatum, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Enteric diseases, Lymphogranuloma venereum,
Granuloma inquinale, Chancroid Passive Fellatio: Herpes type 1 and 2, Nongonococcol urethritis (Chlamidia and others), Gonorrhea, Neisseria meningitidis. Anal Intercouse, Active: Nongonococcol urethritis, Escherichia coli, Gonorrhea, Hepatitis A, B, non-A/non-B, Herpes, Warts -molluscum and condyloma, Syphilis, Trichomoniasis,
Epididymitis/prostatitis, Fungal infections, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus. Anal Intercouse, Passive: Physical protitis, Rectal gonorrhea, Warts -condyloma and molluscum (rare), Nonspecific proctitis (Chlamidia and others), Herpes, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Trichomoniasis, Corynebacterium,
Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus, Candidiasis. Analinction (dung-eating, "rimming"): Enteric diseases: Gay bowel syndrome (explained below) PLUS Escherichia coli and Helminthic parasites, Oral warts, Oral gonorrhea, Syphilis, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid. Fist/Finger Insertion,
Passive: Internal scrapes, Anal sphincter tears, Perforations of the colon, Acute abdomen, having to wear a diaper.
Toys/Apparatus: Allergic reactions, Friction dermatitis, Physical torsions, Varicoceles, Peyronie's disease, Fungal infections, Lost rectal objects, Testicular strangulation ("cock rings").
Gay Bowel Syndrome is a collection of bowel diseases which lead to dysfunction of the lower bowel tract and is prevalent throughout the "gay" community. GBS requires one wear a colostomy bag. Shigellosis is an acute bacteria infection like salmonellosis, it can lead to a diarrhea-induced dehydration death in infants and the elderly. Infected individuals [HIV] should never handle food, yet how many "gays" work in restaurants and handle food?
Hepatitus A and B - a viral liver disease spread by fecal contamination (A), or by blood (B). The latter type is considered to be transmitted "by 'parenteral injection' of saliva or semen positive for B antigen through breaks in anal or oral mucosa during anilingual (tongue/anus) contact or proctogenital intercouse (penile/rectal sodomy)" (New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, p.302.)
This is normal, natural and healthy?
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
"Equality" Requires Anarchy To Fully Succeed
There's a reason we have laws.
There's a reason our forefathers had the foresight and wisdom to conceive cultural and societal boundaries.
There's a reason why we 'call a spade, a spade' : common sense.
Our laws, doctrines and boundaries are erected to maintain healthy order, balance and functioning to [our] society. It isn't perfect, as no system has ever been. But America got it closer to perfect than anyone. As it happens, our standards of order were inspired by a theistic frame of reference - Christianity.
We apply these boundaries/guidelines to promote healthy functioning and prosperity to the populace.
Our standards of order are like cogs in a great machine, both holding it together and facilitating it's operation.
Our standards of order are applied constantly. There are reasons why our government has always discouraged the destructive practice of anal sodomy. There are reasons it discourages drinking to excess. Or forces cyclists to wear helmets. Or enforces child protection laws. Or forces people to wear clothes. Or promotes marriage to promote responsible procreation and healthy child-rearing.
Government has a vested interest in the health of it's populace, and therefore maintains well-concieved boundaries.
Homosexual activists are at war with this 'boundaries' mindset. They will gladly throw the baby (cultural prosperity arisen from healthy boundaries) out with the bathwater (standards of order that discourage deviancy). They would gladly stand on top of a cultural wasteland and proudly declare "victory".
For when you abolish and suppress standards of order to accomodate one mode of deviancy, you grant access for every other form; waiting in the wings like flies gathering at the screen door to gain access to your clean home. You have yourself a cesspool - an enviornment so favorable to a myriad of harmful life forms. Within your cesspool, cleanliness becomes abolished. Within our society, standards of clean living and values become abolished. And then what you have is a wasteland, prey to every manner of suppressed expression of deviancy that would normally lie dormant in men's hearts, free to be fully expressed and indulged. For there would no longer be standards of order to discourage and inhibit those desires. For when you unravel the tapestry, the is no longer any structure, just masses of loose materials with no rhyme or reason. Gay "rights" demand collapse of order; of abolition of conventional wisdom; of complete subversion of common sense; the abandoning of healthy standards.
Gay "rights" can only attain fruition in this sort of climate, this sort of cesspool. When "nothing is sacred", nothing shall be. And deviancy will run rampant. And political correctness will become god. And all men will give in to their basest, carnal urges; pillage and plunder. And cavort. And frolic. And savage each other. And defile. And rape. And loot. And murder. And kidnap. And intoxicate themselves with excesses.
--this reality will be the unavoidable side-effect, by-product, and aftermath of the societal demands of "equality", "inclusiveness" and "tolerance". Basic human nature, unbridled by order, gaurentees this will be the only outcome. We saw this happen in Greece and Rome.
In this sort of Utopia, oppressed, passive-aggressive gay activists would stand victorious over their conquered wasteland, standing beneath their omnipressant gay rainbow, swords held high, celebrating their victory. And then they'd walk off and probably get mugged or clubbed to death by one of their fellow benefactors of "tolerance", one of their fellow cesspool stablemates.
There's a reason our forefathers had the foresight and wisdom to conceive cultural and societal boundaries.
There's a reason why we 'call a spade, a spade' : common sense.
Our laws, doctrines and boundaries are erected to maintain healthy order, balance and functioning to [our] society. It isn't perfect, as no system has ever been. But America got it closer to perfect than anyone. As it happens, our standards of order were inspired by a theistic frame of reference - Christianity.
We apply these boundaries/guidelines to promote healthy functioning and prosperity to the populace.
Our standards of order are like cogs in a great machine, both holding it together and facilitating it's operation.
Our standards of order are applied constantly. There are reasons why our government has always discouraged the destructive practice of anal sodomy. There are reasons it discourages drinking to excess. Or forces cyclists to wear helmets. Or enforces child protection laws. Or forces people to wear clothes. Or promotes marriage to promote responsible procreation and healthy child-rearing.
Government has a vested interest in the health of it's populace, and therefore maintains well-concieved boundaries.
Homosexual activists are at war with this 'boundaries' mindset. They will gladly throw the baby (cultural prosperity arisen from healthy boundaries) out with the bathwater (standards of order that discourage deviancy). They would gladly stand on top of a cultural wasteland and proudly declare "victory".
For when you abolish and suppress standards of order to accomodate one mode of deviancy, you grant access for every other form; waiting in the wings like flies gathering at the screen door to gain access to your clean home. You have yourself a cesspool - an enviornment so favorable to a myriad of harmful life forms. Within your cesspool, cleanliness becomes abolished. Within our society, standards of clean living and values become abolished. And then what you have is a wasteland, prey to every manner of suppressed expression of deviancy that would normally lie dormant in men's hearts, free to be fully expressed and indulged. For there would no longer be standards of order to discourage and inhibit those desires. For when you unravel the tapestry, the is no longer any structure, just masses of loose materials with no rhyme or reason. Gay "rights" demand collapse of order; of abolition of conventional wisdom; of complete subversion of common sense; the abandoning of healthy standards.
Gay "rights" can only attain fruition in this sort of climate, this sort of cesspool. When "nothing is sacred", nothing shall be. And deviancy will run rampant. And political correctness will become god. And all men will give in to their basest, carnal urges; pillage and plunder. And cavort. And frolic. And savage each other. And defile. And rape. And loot. And murder. And kidnap. And intoxicate themselves with excesses.
--this reality will be the unavoidable side-effect, by-product, and aftermath of the societal demands of "equality", "inclusiveness" and "tolerance". Basic human nature, unbridled by order, gaurentees this will be the only outcome. We saw this happen in Greece and Rome.
In this sort of Utopia, oppressed, passive-aggressive gay activists would stand victorious over their conquered wasteland, standing beneath their omnipressant gay rainbow, swords held high, celebrating their victory. And then they'd walk off and probably get mugged or clubbed to death by one of their fellow benefactors of "tolerance", one of their fellow cesspool stablemates.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)