Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Sound, Irrefutable Evidence of Gay Self-Destruction

This compiled information is from in a blog called "Consequences of Sodomy". The author is seen railing against the politically-correct public's embrace and promotion of homosexuality in the face of the glaring medical evidence showing how harmful it is. As a disclaimer I would like to note that this author's continual branding of gays as  "Sodomites" is very coarse and insensitive, but the medical literature he/she quotes speaks for itself. Very informative blog:

Why doesn't the mainstream media report these FACTS?
The increase in children being born out of wedlock in
Scandinavia since marriage was redefined! William Murray, the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, warns of the dangers of legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. He says Scandinavia has had nearly a decade of legal homosexual marriage, and it has nearly destroyed the institution of marriage altogether. More details: (See more facts at Lifestyle Consequences of homosexuals.

The High Cost of Aids - The James Hartline Report On The Frontlines of the Culture War January 29, 2007 - The Great Rainbow Robbery: Gay Activists Costing America Billions Of Dollars In Medical Expenses To Pay For Unsafe Sex Practices

-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:08 AM
Subject: People should hand out flyers, exposing sodomites

To the following article, I would like to add -- the reason sodomites are prone to a myriad of infections and an early death is because the lining of the rectum was made by God for one purpose only -- to rid the body of waste.

The lining of the vagina is tough, like the skin on our hands, so it can withstand the trauma of intercourse and child bearing, but the lining of the anus is too delicate to withstand any trauma.

Anal intercourse, penile or otherwise, traumatizes the soft tissues of the rectal lining. As a consequence, the lining of the rectum is almost always traumatized to some degree by any act of anal intercourse. Even in the absence of major trauma, minor or microscopic tears in the rectal lining allow for immediate contamination and the entry of germs into the bloodstream."

Furthermore, comparable tears in the vagina are not only less frequent because of the relative toughness of the vaginal lining, but the environment of the vagina is vastly cleaner than that of the rectum. Indeed, we are designed with a nearly impenetrable barrier between the bloodstream and the extraordinarily toxic and infectious contents of the bowel.

Anal intercourse creates a breach in this barrier for the receptive partner, whether or not the insertive partner is wearing a condom."

In addition to the trauma of intercourse, semen can eat away at the intestinal lining. This allows a person to "infect themselves" as the bacteria from their feces enter the blood stream.

As a result of this, a man is 2,700 times more likely to get an HIV infection from anal intercourse than he is from vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse is so dangerous, the United Kingdom Blood Transfusion Service will not accept blood from any man who has ever had sex with another man, even if they were practicing 'safe sex' with a condom.

Regarding safe sex, even condom manufacturers advise against anal intercourse. The condom company, Durex, said in October 2000 : "Anal intercourse is a high-risk activity because of the potential for infection from STDs including HIV transmission. Currently, there are no specific standards for the manufacture of condoms for anal sex. Current medical advice is therefore to avoid anal sex..

Ah, but our schools say it's normal.

One study calculated that 32% of condoms broke and 21% slipped during anal intercourse. The researchers pointed out that "condoms manufactured in the United States generally are labeled "for vaginal use only."

Would you believe that our Supreme Court struck down Texas' anti-sodomy law?

In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote that the sodomy law "demeans the lives of homosexual persons" and that homosexuals "are entitled to respect for their private lives."

"The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime," Kennedy said.

This majority opinion makes no sense at all. Of course the state constantly interferes with people's privacy. Has Justice Kennedy ever heard of incest, pedophilia and bestiality? Or, how about calling a prostitute to come to your house? Are we now to assume that these can be done in private?

And how does it demean their lives? Who would have ever thought that trying to save lives would be considered a demeaning act? The only thing demeaning is the act, itself.

The Center for Disease Control warns that men who have sex with men can result in rapid, extensive transmission of sexually transmitted diseases."

The Gay and Lesbian Medical Association confirmed these statistics in an article published by the homosexual advocacy website 'gaywired' in July 2002.

Medical studies and other evidence indicate that individuals who engage in homosexual behavior experience dramatically higher risks of domestic violence, mental illness, substance abuse, life-threatening disease, multiple sex partners and premature death by up to 20 years.

College-aged men who engage in homosexual behavior are at risk of dying up to 20 years younger than other men, according to Oxford University's International Journal of Epidemiology, which reported: "Life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 20 years less than for all men -- nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 years will not reach their 65th birthday."

"The probability of violence occurring in a gay couple is mathematically double the probability of that in a heterosexual couple," write the editors of the National Gay & Lesbian Domestic Violence Network newsletter.

The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that "people with same-sex sexual behavior are at greater risk for psychiatric disorders" - including bipolar, obsessive-compulsive, and anxiety disorders, major depression, and substance abuse.

The Medical Institute of Sexual Health reports: "Homosexual men are at significantly increased risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.

Women who have sex with women are at significantly increased risk of bacterial vaginosis, breast cancer and ovarian cancer than are heterosexual women." (Executive Summary, "Health Implications
Associated with Homosexuality," 1999,

The Institute reports that "significantly higher percentages of homosexual men and women abuse drugs, alcohol and tobacco than do heterosexuals."

A Detroit homosexual newsmagazine columnist wrote regarding his partner: "This is his first relationship, so he has not yet been ruined by all the heartache, lies, deceit, and game-playing that are the hallmark of gay relationships...

Nine out of 10 gay men cheat on their lovers."

It is apparent that the six justices who voted to overturn the Texas law on sodomy were absolutely clueless, regarding the health risks. How is it possible that anyone with a modicum of intelligence
would willfully be a party to the proliferation of deadly bacteria and viruses?

Our founding fathers must be turning over in their graves. Nowhere in the Constitution is there even a suggestion that sodomy, or other perverse sex acts, or freedom to engage in them in private should be allowed.

On the contrary, these six justices made a mockery of the Constitution: You have to look no further than the Preamble:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Not only does this Court not promote the general welfare of our country. But they are party to its destruction. I guarantee that because of this decision, homosexuals will have a freer hand in public schools in their indoctrination efforts.

The above has come to pass.

After all - the Supreme Court gave its blessing, so it must be normal.


As long as they are hell bent about discussing homosexuality in our schools, then why not give all the facts and let the students decide if they want to live a life of pain and suffering and an early death, or live a normal life.

How stupid of me -- I thought the sole purpose of schools was to EDUCATE -- not INDOCTRINATE.

From time to time, I like to send out an e-mail which was sent to me from one of my friends, a paramedic. Now, would be another one of those ideal times.

Dear Doctor,

Your article was a splendid read. As a former fireman and paramedic for the city of San Francisco, I would be more than happy to provide you with anecdotal information regarding the lifestyle of the homosexual men and women; people who clog the EMS system with their strange and disgusting acts of sexual gratification. These acts not only cause infectious disease rates to skyrocket, but they are the source of traumatic injuries to the genital-urinary and lower intestinal tract. Some of these injuries are so severe, they often cause death to the individuals involved.

I was called to many residences and/or bath house for rectal bleeds. These bleeds were many times the result of the infamous homosexual act of "fisting." Many time we transported patients (in the Jackknife position) with such objects as zucchini, squash and cucumbers lodged in their rectums.

The San Francisco General Hospital has a surgical museum for surgical interns, nurses, other doctors and paramedics. The museum displays objects that have been surgically removed from gay men's intestinal tracts. Among these items are; light bulbs, bananas, rodents, batteries, Billy clubs, super-sized dildos, and a host of other objects that would make the stomach turn.

I had a younger brother (who was gay) who died from AIDS in 1986. No one can tell me that HIV hasn't affected me or my family. My brother was a good kid. He was molested when he was very young by some bastard.


I ask you, does homosexuality deserve being embraced, or taught in our schools as just another normal alternative lifestyle, or should it be drop-kicked, along with satan, back to hell, where they came from?

Frank Joseph MD

Subject: People should hand out flyers
Date: 4/14/2005 4:56:38 PM Pacific Standard Time

April 14, 2005 -- WHEN U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spoke Tuesday night at NYU's Vanderbilt Hall, "The room was packed with some 300 students and there were many protesters outside because of Scalia's vitriolic dissent last year in the case that overturned the Texas law against gay sex," our source reports. "One gay student asked whether government had any business enacting and enforcing laws against consensual sodomy. Following Scalia's answer, the student asked a follow-up: 'Do you sodomize your wife?' The audience was shocked, especially since Mrs. Scalia [Maureen] was in attendance. The justice replied that the question was unworthy of an answer."

* * * *

Groups should organize, stand outside these events and hand out flyers that contain factual information on what the medical industry calls "Lavender diseases." Those are the ones that sodomites and lesbians suffer from constantly.

Perhaps if some of these young folks on college campuses would see how filthy such sex is, it might change their minds about promoting such disease ridden "acts of love between consenting adults."

This is an excerpt from one of my old columns:

For those who have been influenced by "superstars" such as Cher and Elton John to "accept those of the gay lifestyle," here's a short laundry list of what sexual deviancy brings to the participant:

(Anal) Douches, Lubricants: Allergic reactions, Rectal fatty tumors Active Fellatio: Physical abrasions, Oral gonorrhea, Herpes progenitalis I and II, Nongonococcal pharyngitis (Chlamidia and others), Oral condyloma acuminatum, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Enteric diseases, Lymphogranuloma venereum,

Granuloma inquinale, Chancroid Passive Fellatio: Herpes type 1 and 2, Nongonococcol urethritis (Chlamidia and others), Gonorrhea, Neisseria meningitidis. Anal Intercouse, Active: Nongonococcol urethritis, Escherichia coli, Gonorrhea, Hepatitis A, B, non-A/non-B, Herpes, Warts -molluscum and condyloma, Syphilis, Trichomoniasis,

Epididymitis/prostatitis, Fungal infections, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus. Anal Intercouse, Passive: Physical protitis, Rectal gonorrhea, Warts -condyloma and molluscum (rare), Nonspecific proctitis (Chlamidia and others), Herpes, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Trichomoniasis, Corynebacterium,

Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus, Candidiasis. Analinction (dung-eating, "rimming"): Enteric diseases: Gay bowel syndrome (explained below) PLUS Escherichia coli and Helminthic parasites, Oral warts, Oral gonorrhea, Syphilis, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid. Fist/Finger Insertion,

Passive: Internal scrapes, Anal sphincter tears, Perforations of the colon, Acute abdomen, having to wear a diaper.

Toys/Apparatus: Allergic reactions, Friction dermatitis, Physical torsions, Varicoceles, Peyronie's disease, Fungal infections, Lost rectal objects, Testicular strangulation ("cock rings").

Gay Bowel Syndrome is a collection of bowel diseases which lead to dysfunction of the lower bowel tract and is prevalent throughout the "gay" community. GBS requires one wear a colostomy bag. Shigellosis is an acute bacteria infection like salmonellosis, it can lead to a diarrhea-induced dehydration death in infants and the elderly. Infected individuals [HIV] should never handle food, yet how many "gays" work in restaurants and handle food?

Hepatitus A and B - a viral liver disease spread by fecal contamination (A), or by blood (B). The latter type is considered to be transmitted "by 'parenteral injection' of saliva or semen positive for B antigen through breaks in anal or oral mucosa during anilingual (tongue/anus) contact or proctogenital intercouse (penile/rectal sodomy)" (New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, p.302.)

This is normal, natural and healthy?

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

"Equality" Requires Anarchy To Fully Succeed

There's a reason we have laws.

There's a reason our forefathers had the foresight and wisdom to conceive cultural and societal boundaries.

There's a reason why we 'call a spade, a spade' : common sense.

Our laws, doctrines and boundaries are erected to maintain healthy order, balance and functioning to [our] society. It isn't perfect, as no system has ever been. But America got it closer to perfect than anyone. As it happens, our standards of order were inspired by a theistic frame of reference - Christianity.

We apply these boundaries/guidelines to promote healthy functioning and prosperity to the populace.
Our standards of order are like cogs in a great machine, both holding it together and facilitating it's operation.

Our standards of order are applied constantly. There are reasons why our government has always discouraged the destructive practice of anal sodomy. There are reasons it discourages drinking to excess. Or forces cyclists to wear helmets. Or enforces child protection laws. Or forces people to wear clothes. Or promotes marriage to promote responsible procreation and healthy child-rearing.

Government has a vested interest in the health of it's populace, and therefore maintains well-concieved boundaries.

Homosexual activists are at war with this 'boundaries' mindset. They will gladly throw the baby (cultural prosperity arisen from healthy boundaries) out with the bathwater (standards of order that discourage deviancy). They would gladly stand on top of a cultural wasteland and proudly declare "victory".

For when you abolish and suppress standards of order to accomodate one mode of deviancy, you grant access for every other form; waiting in the wings like flies gathering at the screen door to gain access to your clean home. You have yourself a cesspool - an enviornment so favorable to a myriad of harmful life forms. Within your cesspool, cleanliness becomes abolished. Within our society, standards of clean living and values become abolished. And then what you have is a wasteland, prey to every manner of suppressed expression of deviancy that would normally lie dormant in men's hearts, free to be fully expressed and indulged. For there would no longer be standards of order to discourage and inhibit those desires. For when you unravel the tapestry, the is no longer any structure, just masses of loose materials with no rhyme or reason. Gay "rights" demand collapse of order; of abolition of conventional wisdom; of complete subversion of common sense; the abandoning of healthy standards.

Gay "rights" can only attain fruition in this sort of climate, this sort of cesspool. When "nothing is sacred", nothing shall be. And deviancy will run rampant. And political correctness will become god. And all men will give in to their basest, carnal urges; pillage and plunder. And cavort. And frolic. And savage each other. And defile. And rape. And loot. And murder. And kidnap. And intoxicate themselves with excesses.

 --this reality will be the unavoidable side-effect, by-product, and aftermath of the societal demands of "equality", "inclusiveness" and "tolerance". Basic human nature, unbridled by order, gaurentees this will be the only outcome. We saw this happen in Greece and Rome.

In this sort of Utopia, oppressed, passive-aggressive gay activists would stand victorious over their conquered wasteland, standing beneath their omnipressant gay rainbow, swords held high, celebrating their victory. And then they'd walk off and probably get mugged or clubbed to death by one of their fellow benefactors of "tolerance", one of their fellow cesspool stablemates.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Gay Activists Do Not Represent Your Gay Loved Ones

All of us know somebody who's gay. It's somebody in our close cirlce of friends. Or  a close family member. Or, maybe it's just some Media icon that we relate closely to.

All of these people are dignified, praiseworthy, and quality human beings. They are not inherently inept. They are attracted to people of the same gender, and then they carry on with life.

But there are those who refuse to carry on with life. They refuse to recognize there are aspects to their existence that don't revolve around their same-sex attractions. And they refuse to acknowledge that their sexuality isn't the very center of their existence in the world. With these convictions, these people adhere to and subscribe to the Left's sexual identity political talking points. It is almost a religion to them, with specific doctrines and philosophies that they base everything in their life around, and they then constantly push this mindset to those in their personal lives and onto people in power. These people are called gay activists. These people are not your gay cousin, aunt, sister-in-law or son/daughter. They are a breed apart. Learn to distinguish the two.

Sex and the City Actress Cynthia Nixon, indignant by the Industries expectations of her, as a lesbian, to conform to a narrow definition/social narrative regarding her sexual identity,  railing against people "... trying to make a litmus test for who is considered gay and who is not." She reflected on where organizers of a gay conference where she was giving a speech at tried to get her to change the wording, something she rejected.

" And they tried to get me to change it, because they said it implies that homosexuality can be a choice. And for me, it is a choice. I understand that for many people it's not, but for me it's a choice, and you don't get to define my gayness for me."

Addressing the idea that she was gay during her (14 year) marriage, but didn't know it, Nixon said, "I also feel like people think I was walking around in a cloud and didn't realize I was gay, which I find really offensive. I find it offensive to me, but I also find it offensive to all the men I've been out with."

The Sex and the City Star is a Hollywood icon. Apparently, she didn't get the memo that the dictates of political correctness demand that people in her status have to lie to accomodate gay propagandists' talking points. She spoke with her heart, as her own person.

Nazis and Gay Rights Movement: Exact Same Origin

This post will illustrate the shocking common origins shared by the modern gay "rights" movement and Germany's Nazi Party.
The popular narrative attempts to brand the Nazis as a horrible oppressor against homosexuals of that age, subjecting them to horrible persecution in Nazi death camps akin to a gay holocaust. In reality, a relatively small number of gays were worked to death in these camps. Hitler and his (mostly gay) inner-circles exuded a harsh, hateful opposition to (effiminate) homosexuals as a cover for their own secret inclinations. The modern gay movement begain in Germany.
In the mid-late-1800's, the Higher Criticism movement had swept through Germany, where scholars of the day were challenging and discounting the meaning and authenticity of the Scriptures. This became a cultural movement there. On the heels of this -intertwined- occultism and homosexuality began to seize power there, coming to full fruition in the 1920's, and was instrumental in the collapse of the Third Reich. Jorg Lanz Van Liebenfels, gay occultist and occultist magazine Publicist, is known as the person who gave Hitler his depraved ideas and philosophies. Liebenfels formed the widescale occultist-and-murderous Armanian Order, which morphed itself to attain a veneer of political legitimacy and changing it's name to Thule Society, which then infiltrated and fused with the Nazi Party's earliest incarnation. A German-American soldier, Henry Gerber, returned from Occupied Germany after ww1. While there, Gerber had joined the "German Society for Human Rights", the modern gay movement in it's infancy. This Human Rights leader was flagrant homosexual Ernst Rhom, the leader of the Nazi Party in it's earliest incarnation, head of the Storm Troopers, Captain in the German army, himself recruited into homosexuality by the creator of the Brownshirts, Gerhardt Rossbach. The earliest incarnation of the Brownshirts was an exclusively homosexual group. When Gerber came back from the war, he and 2 other men formed the American "Human Rights" chapter in Chicago. Their efforts were cut short there, after they were arrested for having sex with little boys. Gerber bribed his way out of prosecution and went underground. He went on to molest/recruit another boy named Champ Simmons. Simmons, as an adult, would go on to molest/recruit Harry Hay - the father of the gay rights movement in America. Hay, famously, was photographed wearing a sign at a gay pride parade, "Nambla walks With Me", motivated by his disgust and indignation of the way latter-day gay activists were publicly distancing the gay movement from the pedophile movement.

It is no coincidence, then, that the modern-day gay movement employs such facist, totalitarian tacticts. The same quality that makes One an effective gay activist is the same quality which made people like Hitler so devastatingly effective.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Gay promiscuity and it's societal cost

Over half of all H.I.V/A.I.D.S. cases are men who have sex with men, or MSM. By the end of 2006, 53% of the total H.I.V. cases in america were gay and bi men, which comprises only 2% of the population. According to the C.D.C. (Centers for Disease Control) MSM are 44 times as likely to contract H.I.V. than straights. In a recent C.D.C. study of M.S.M. from 21 major metropolitan areas of the U.S., 1-in-5 were H.I.V. positive. And of those, 44% weren't even aware of it. The following paragraph reflects on studies regarding promiscuity of MSM.

Research indicates that the average male homosexual has hundreds of sex partners in his lifetime:
· The Dutch study of partnered homosexuals, which was published in the journal AIDS, found that men with a steady partner had an average of eight sexual partners per year.[12]
· Bell and Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having one thousand or more sex partners.[13]
· In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in the Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101-500." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1,000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than one thousand lifetime sexual partners.[14]
· A survey conducted by the homosexual magazine Genre found that 24 percent of the respondents said they had had more than one hundred sexual partners in their lifetime. The magazine noted that several respondents suggested including a category of those who had more than one thousand sexual partners. Here's the link comparing the gay lifestyle to straights':

So why should these figures be of any concern to the rest of us who aren't gay? Here's why: the drastic, disproportionate cost to society for treatment of A.I.D.S. compared to all other lethal maladies. In a 2011 report from the C.D.C. and N.I.H. (National Institute of Health) which showed how much money was budgeted per death in all deadly diseases, A.I.D.S. patients were budgeted 225,656 dollars, more than all the other major health problems combined. For example, diabetes was only budgeted 13, 803 dollars per death. Heart and stroke victims, 2,429 dollars per death. Who is paying for that tiny demographic (less than 2%) of the population which studies reveal to have hundreds of sexual partners in their lifetime? Why can't people with more typical diseases have access to that staggeringly disproportionate funding that goes mostly to a tiny minority within the populace? Talk about entitlement.

Bath houses. Where you check in, pay a small fee, and walk around a building nude, or in a towell, and have random, indiscriminate, multiple sexual partners. Where men assigned a room will leave the door open and display themselves in the pose/position of their sexual preference as an open invitiation to any-and-all comers, any passerby. Our government permits the operation of these lust factories, but doesn't bat an eye dramatically outspending on A.I.D.S. what they could be doling out for more organic, natural diseases. The gay lifestyle hurts us plenty.

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Gay Harms: Gay Marriage Explained

This is so not the purpose of this blog, but I'm going to make an opportunity to submit my voice of reason against gay marriage.

Gay marriage is the ultimate validation of the gay lifestyle. Moreso, it's the Government's official, authenticating stamp of legitimacy bestowed on this lifestyle - a title which makes it incontrovertable, inscrutable, and nearly invincible to historical manifestations of stigmatization against it.

Gay marriage is the ultimate expression of destigmatization. In this case, destigmatization through desanctification, as in desanctify, as in, cheapening something, devaluing in, nothing's sacred. By rendering nothing sacred, gays will achieve the optimal enviornment for attaining power, one where desactification renders people too indifferent to tell what merits sanctity and goodness.

Gay marriage detaches the sanctity from matrimonial unions. Traditional Marriage is sanctioned, it is ordained by the Creator Himself. It is sanctified by our Government as the exemplar of the most optimal enviornment for fostering responsible procreation and child-rearing. And what of elderly and infertile heterosexual couples marrying then? Well, these exceptions-to-the-rule are faithful emulations of that accepted, sanctified societal standard, and are thus valid.

When you detach the sanctity from something, it becomes a meaningless expression. In responsible society, we sanctify certain things that bring about healthy order and functioning. We sanctify them because they are expressions of successful, healthy living. Government doesn't grant heterosexual couples marriage simply because that's "who they love". When you desanctify such a fundamental societal construct, it cheapens and devalues that which was bestowed sanctity in the first place -the traditional family - the bedrock, the cornerstone of healthy society. And then marriage means nothing anymore, just a trivial label to recognize the coupling of two individuals. This desanctification spells the end of the nuclear family, which is something Karl Marx envisioned as being the best way to break a nation. As Commentator Matt Barber says, gay marriage is "a political and legal calculus that is being used as a weapon to destroy religious liberty".

  "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." -Genesis 2:24

What enables one to unite and become 'one flesh'? Why, it's having anatomical complimentariness -separate but opposite. The structure of the vagina is designed for intromission of the penis -even down to the cellular level - the penis and vagina are designed to be united. Sperm cells are uniquely-designed to be able to bypass the anti-microbial defenses within the vagina.

The pro-gay-cheerleading media has it's own narrative of what merits marriage. To them, gays are that homely, stable couple down the street who just want to have what straight couples have; who's domestic "normalcy" could put to shame almost any straight married couple. Have you seen these people? I haven't. Never. Only in print. I've seen bath houses. I've seen elaborate networks of websites and literature promoting anonymous, indiscriminate gay sex. I've come across innumerable anecdotes illustrating turbulent, painful lives of domestic instability in the gay community. I've seen innumerable anecdotes illustrating lives of incessant partying and swinging in the gay community.

Have I come across anecdotes of those aformentioned homely, stable and functioning gay couples? Sure, because every single one of them has been garishly and gratuitiously publicized in some news story to pass off as the normal gay reality. But in reality, the likelihood of those examples is like finding an albino specimen in the animal kingdom.

Gay World View: In Their Own Words

This post will illustrate the venom that gay activists are invariably filled with, hateful, malicious rhetoric they expouse, ironically while simultaneously promoting their "vulnerable-oppressed-victims-in-need-of-protections" narrative.

In the gay (activists') world view, noone could foster criticisms for the gay community unless they are an overzealous, bigoted, hate-mongering, irrational homophobe. But from the following quotes, I think the justification for being quite weary and critical of those pushing the gay culture will be quite clear.

-In their own words-

Just recently, the powerful gay lobby group, "Good as You", wrote this startling boast in regards to it's opponents on the gay "rights" issue:

“[I]n the world where anti-gay is ‘pro-family’ and marriage is involved in some sort of crazy scary war, ‘not celebrating homosexuality’ means unapologetically demonizing and stigmatizing those who embrace a society where equality and acceptance are the name of the game.”[1]

Here, on the front page of the "Gay Liberation Network", one of the most powerful of gay "rights" groups, another shocking, intolerant boast:

"Win or lose, we must respond. If we lose, we must forcefully reject the Court's decision. If we win, we must forcefully remind other Americans that we need legal equality in more than just marriage, but in employment, housing and public accommodations. We must also remind other Americans that we demand more than simple legal equality -- we demand LGBT-affirming education in all of the nation's public schools"

Here are authors of what has been called "The gay public-relations bible" laying out their battle plan to sell homosexuality to America based on lies.

In this deliberately deceitful agenda for America Kirk and Madsen write that they intend to “get tough” on straights. They further write, “…it is time to learn from Madison Avenue and to roll out the big guns. . . . We are talking about propaganda. Kirk and Madsen explained the central tenant of their strategy: “The public should be persuaded that gays are victims of circumstance, that they no more chose their sexual orientation than they did, say, their height, skin color, talents, or limitations. (We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been ‘born gay’--even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.)” Here, the authors admit that human sexuality “seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors,” yet they urge readers to abandon the truth for “practical purposes,” i.e. furthering “The Gay Agenda.” The propagandists could not have been clearer about their plan to deceive Americans.  (the following blog has a complete rundown on the Kirk and Madsen lies/hypocricies, as well as those of other gay agenda figures:

-Michael Swift's "the Gay Manifesto"-

"The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated....Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks...We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity....We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses...wherever men are with men together...We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons .... Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding.....We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy..we have infiltrated your ranks.

...we are the natural aristocrats of the human race....There will be no compromises...Those who oppose us will be exiled....We shall raise vast private armies... to defeat you..."

This rueful, grandiose rambling is as shocking for it's content as it is for how it eerily mirrors the character manifestation of every gay activist I've ever read quotes from. It is a Freaudian slip of biblical proportions. It's author went on to implicitly admit that it was a literal translation of his pent-up inner fantasies. For damage control, he would then go on to say it was all just sattire, so as to invalidate the whole thing because of it's extremely damning content.

What's so unsettling is how it articulates perfectly the true demands of the gay rights movement, the ones that they go to enormous lengths to shroud in rhetoric, euphemisms and political correctness mantras. But what's also eerie is that the entire piece isn't the least bit outlandish-sounding to anyone familiar with gay activism.

In a recent speech at Elmhurst College in N.Y., gay activist/Entertainment Icon Dan Savage had some pretty outlandish rhetoric:

"...a lot of people now miss that the "It Gets Better" Project is an aggressive act. That from the outset there was an outstretched middle finger at the heart of (it)....The idea was we're gonna talk to your kids whether you like it or not, that...we're gonna reach into your kids and talk to your kids about being queer - whether you like it or not."

Even the most casual observer could see how Savages stone-cold serious declaration here eerily parallels the totalitarian takeover theme of the gay manifesto written above.

Here, Greg Quinlan, proponent of the Ex-Gay movement recounts an encounter with gay activist Wayne Besen: "The truth is that Besen once said to me in a private conversation that someone should run me over with a bus or inject me with AIDS". Very similarly, a gay activist once threatened to push Pro-Family activist Peter Labarbera into a busy street.

Here, the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center posted a billboard ad saying "H.I.V. is a gay disease...own it; end it".

Here, N.Y. gay activist Daniel Villareal ("Queerty") admits gays want to indoctrinate kids:

"They accuse us of exploiting children and in response we say, “NOOO! We’re not gonna make kids learn about homosexuality, we swear! It’s not like we’re trying to recruit your children or anything. But let’s face it—that’s a lie.” “We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality.... I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT..Recruiting children? You bet we are.

It seems that promoting and protecting a false narrative for so long is so exhausting that this activist just wanted to unburden himself from that heavy load, in a faux-pas moment that made gay activist everywhere recoil in shock.

In a recent speech at a National Journalism Conference to High School students, Dan Savage berated a group of as many as 100 students when they began walking out, some of them in tears, "It’s funny as someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back"

In that speech, Savage promoted profanity-laced lewdness to illustrate his ideologies, with age-innapropriate, sexual innuendo and volitile, Christianity-bashing comments. Telling them they needed " ignore all that bullshit in the Bible".

And here, Obama-appointed Head of the E.E.O.C (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)., Chai Feldblum openly dismisses people's religious liberty when it conflicts with gay "rights". She affirmed that when religious liberty and sexual liberty conflict, she had "a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win,".

And at a 2004 speech at U.C.L.A., Feldblum said she wanted to "Revolutionize social norms" regarding gay sex.

In another forum, Feldblum was quoted as affirming that in the battle between gay "rights" and religious freedom, gays should always win, Christians should always lose, calling it a "zero-sum game".

In the following two videos, expatriots of the homosexual community speak out against the depravity and evil that one encounters in that community.

Here, and ex-gay, ex-gay porn actor speaks about the disturbing elements of darkness and depravity that is generated within oneself when one indulges in male on male anal sodomy. He mentions how it and causes a cloud of darkness to decend over a perso, that anal sex gives birth to "demonic entities" and a "devil" in a person on a spiritual level, that it creates a doorway to the demonic realm. And that he feels the Devil loves the practice of sodomy.  He mentions how this lifestyle resulted in him having to endure "horrible" surgeries to his rectum. He also asserts how indulging in pornography creates an environment within a person where their more receptive to other forms of deviance (he basically gave a real-world example of the Bible's illustration of the "reprobate mind".)

For me, my immediate urge upon viewing this was to put my hands on this man in prayer and give him assurance that he is a valued member in the Body of Christ.

The jesters commenting take particular enjoyment deliberately taking his statements way, way out of the context he's getting at, in a way that's reminsicent of delinquent, rowdy children. -Here is a video posted by the brother of a gay man who committed suicide, but not before creating this sobering indictment of the hypocricy and depravity associated with homosexuality. What comes through is this man's sincere frustration at not being able to enjoy and experience the "It gets better" talking point that the activists purport. But what I'm mostly moved by is the bravery of this man in telling the truth that so flies in the face of the enormous tidal-wave of political correctness propaganda. Rest In Peace, and be with God.

And here, two gay men disown the gay talking points about how gays constitute a family just like straights:

Gay actor Rupert Everett: "I can think of nothing worse than being brought up by two gay dads".

French pro-marriage activist Xavier Bongibault, who's also gay, stated  "everyone needs a mother and a father. It's only natural."